• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Theophylline levels after single daily and divided dosing of a once-a-day theophylline preparation in asthmatic children.

作者信息

Boner A L, Sette L, Vallone G, Plebani M, Messori A

机构信息

Clinica Pediatrica, Universita di Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Allergy. 1989 Feb;62(2):149-53.

PMID:2919803
Abstract

Twelve children with chronic asthma were treated with a single dose of sustained-release theophylline once-a-day taken after supper at 9 PM. During the steady-state period after 15 days of treatment, serum theophylline levels were measured one and two hours after dosing and then every two hours until 9 PM the following day. The peak concentration (mean +/- SD) of serum theophylline (20.9 +/- 6.5 micrograms/mL) was observed eight hours after dosing while the through concentration (4.34 +/- 2.62 micrograms/mL) was measured 24 hours after dosing; the percent fluctuation (mean +/- SD) was 966.45 +/- 1105.55%. Another 15 children were treated with the same preparation administered at 8 AM after breakfast and at 8 PM after supper. Serum samples for theophylline concentration were obtained immediately before dosing at 8 AM and then every two hours for the following 12 hours. The mean theophylline level observed immediately before dosing at 8 AM was 10.16 +/- 3.84 micrograms/mL while the mean level at 8 PM was 9.39 +/- 4.77 micrograms/mL. The peak serum level was 13.07 +/- 5.13 micrograms/mL at 2 PM, while the trough was 9.31 +/- 3.71 micrograms/mL at 10 AM, with a percent fluctuation of 155.21 +/- 147.95%. Few side effects were seen in both groups. The results of our study clearly demonstrated that in children the percent fluctuation and peak-trough differences are far greater with once daily than with twice daily dosing and this should be considered when planning theophylline treatment in asthmatic children. The administration of a once-a-day preparation every 8-12 hours can however result in overlapping absorption patterns.

摘要

相似文献

1
Theophylline levels after single daily and divided dosing of a once-a-day theophylline preparation in asthmatic children.
Ann Allergy. 1989 Feb;62(2):149-53.
2
[Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sustained-release theophylline formulation, Slo-bid, in both single and multiple dosing studies of asthmatic children].
Arerugi. 1989 Mar;38(3):263-71.
3
Bioavailability of a slow-release theophylline capsule given twice daily to preschool children with chronic asthma: comparison with liquid theophylline.
Pediatrics. 1988 Jan;81(1):116-20.
4
Serum drug fluctuations after administration of two sustained-release oral theophylline preparations in asthmatic children.
Clin Ther. 1986;8(2):175-80.
5
Serum theophylline levels in asthmatic children receiving sustained-release theophylline tablets.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1979 Dec;36(12):1698-701.
6
A new sustained-release theophylline suspension for asthmatic children: evaluation of serum theophylline concentrations.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 1987;7(5):345-50.
7
Biopharmaceutic characteristics of a new extended-release theophylline formulation (Uni-Dur).一种新型缓释茶碱制剂(优喘平)的生物药剂学特性
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1995 Aug;75(2):157-61.
8
[24-hour lung function in asthmatic patients: chrono-optimal theophylline therapy as once-daily Euphylong administration vs conventional twice-daily administration].
Pneumologie. 1991 Nov;45 Suppl 4:834-41.
9
Once-a-day dosing with theophylline: a comparison of four sustained-release products.
Ann Allergy. 1992 Jun;68(6):500-6.
10
Efficacy of a 12-hour sustained-release preparation in maintaining therapeutic serum theophylline levels in asthmatic children.
Pediatrics. 1980 Jul;66(1):97-102.