From the Departments of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia.
Quantitative Health Sciences and Outcomes Research.
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1484-1493. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002684.
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is often preserved in patients with aortic stenosis and thus cannot distinguish between normal myocardial contractile function and subclinical dysfunction. Global longitudinal strain and strain rate (SR), which measure myocardial deformation, are robust indicators of myocardial function and can detect subtle myocardial dysfunction that is not apparent with conventional echocardiographic measures. Strain and SR may better predict postoperative outcomes than LVEF. The primary aim of our investigation was to assess the association between global longitudinal strain and serious postoperative outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis having aortic valve replacement. Secondarily, we also assessed the associations between global longitudinal SR and LVEF and the outcomes.
In this post hoc analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial (NCT01187329), we examined the association between measures of myocardial function and the following outcomes: (1) need for postoperative inotropic/vasopressor support; (2) prolonged hospitalization (>7 days); and (3) postoperative atrial fibrillation. Standardized transesophageal echocardiographic examinations were performed after anesthetic induction. Myocardial deformation was measured using speckle-tracking echocardiography. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between measures of myocardial function and outcomes, adjusted for potential confounding factors. The predictive ability of global longitudinal strain, SR, and LVEF was assessed as area under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUCs).
Of 100 patients enrolled in the clinical trial, 86 patients with aortic stenosis had acceptable images for global longitudinal strain analysis. Primarily, worse intraoperative global longitudinal strain was associated with prolonged hospitalization (odds ratio [98.3% confidence interval], 1.22 [1.01-1.47] per 1% decrease [absolute value] in strain; P = .012), but not with other outcomes. Secondarily, worse global longitudinal SR was associated with prolonged hospitalization (odds ratio [99.7% confidence interval], 1.68 [1.01-2.79] per 0.1 second(-1) decrease [absolute value] in SR; P = .003), but not other outcomes. LVEF was not associated with any outcomes. Global longitudinal SR was the best predictor for prolonged hospitalization (AUC, 0.72), followed by global longitudinal strain (AUC, 0.67) and LVEF (AUC, 0.62).
Global longitudinal strain and SR are useful predictors of prolonged hospitalization in patients with aortic stenosis having an aortic valve replacement.
左心室射血分数(LVEF)在主动脉瓣狭窄患者中常保持正常,因此无法区分正常心肌收缩功能和亚临床功能障碍。测量心肌变形的整体纵向应变和应变率(SR)是心肌功能的可靠指标,可以检测到常规超声心动图测量不明显的细微心肌功能障碍。应变和 SR 可能比 LVEF 更好地预测术后结果。我们研究的主要目的是评估主动脉瓣置换术患者的整体纵向应变与严重术后结局之间的关系。其次,我们还评估了整体纵向 SR 和 LVEF 与结局之间的关系。
在这项随机临床试验(NCT01187329)的事后分析中,我们研究了心肌功能指标与以下结局之间的关系:(1)需要术后正性肌力/血管加压支持;(2)住院时间延长(>7 天);(3)术后心房颤动。在麻醉诱导后进行标准经食管超声心动图检查。使用斑点追踪超声心动图测量心肌变形。多变量逻辑回归用于评估心肌功能指标与结局之间的关系,调整了潜在的混杂因素。使用接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUCs)评估整体纵向应变、SR 和 LVEF 的预测能力。
在纳入的 100 例临床试验患者中,86 例主动脉瓣狭窄患者的整体纵向应变分析图像可接受。主要的是,术中整体纵向应变越差与住院时间延长相关(优势比[98.3%置信区间],每降低 1%[绝对值]应变,增加 1.22[1.01-1.47];P =.012),但与其他结局无关。其次,整体纵向 SR 越差与住院时间延长相关(优势比[99.7%置信区间],每降低 0.1 秒(绝对值)SR 增加 1.68[1.01-2.79];P =.003),但与其他结局无关。LVEF 与任何结局均无关。整体纵向 SR 是预测住院时间延长的最佳指标(AUC,0.72),其次是整体纵向应变(AUC,0.67)和 LVEF(AUC,0.62)。
整体纵向应变和 SR 是主动脉瓣置换术患者主动脉瓣狭窄术后住院时间延长的有用预测指标。