Ramaswamy Anant, Joshi Amit, Noronha Vanita, Patil Vijay, Sahu Arvind, Manickam Deepan R, Kothari Rushabh, Sable Nilesh, Agrawal Archi, Menon Santosh, Prabhash Kumar
Department of Medical Oncology, Radiology,Nuclear Medicine and Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2017 Jul-Sep;38(3):311-315. doi: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_154_16.
Poor-risk advanced Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are an under-evaluated and difficult to treat subset of patients with poor prognosis. While Temsirolimus is the approved first line therapy for this category, Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are also commonly uses as initial treatment. We present an analysis of poor-risk advanced RCC treated in our institute.
Patients diagnosed as poor-risk (as per Heng criteria) advanced RCC from June 2008 to December 2015 were analysed for baseline demographics, treatment received, toxicity (primarily Grade 3 and Grade 4), response rates (RR) and survival.
60 patients (43 males, 17 females) with a median age of 53 years were included for final analysis. Median ECOG PS was 1, clear cell was the predominant histology (63.3%), and 46.7% of patients had greater than 2 sites of metastases. Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Temsirolimus and Pazopanib were used to treat 43.3%, 36.7%, 8.3% and 6.7% of patients respectively, while 3 patients were offered upfront best supportive care. Common adverse events included skin rash (31.5%), HFS (Grade 2 and 3 - 30.8%), mucositis (26.3%), hypertension (24.5%), and dyslipidaemias (22.8%). 41 patients were available for response - overall response rate observed was 15%, while clinical benefit rate was 50%. Median progression free survival was 5.78 months (4.67-6.89) and median overall survival (OS) was 10.05 months (7.31-12.79).
A majority of poor-risk metastatic RCC patients in our study were treated with TKIs and the survival outcomes appear to suggest that this strategy is a feasible alternative to Temsirolimus in the Indian setting.
预后不良的晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)是一类评估不足且难以治疗、预后较差的患者亚群。虽然替西罗莫司是这类患者获批的一线治疗药物,但酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)也常用于初始治疗。我们对本院治疗的预后不良的晚期RCC进行了分析。
分析2008年6月至2015年12月期间诊断为预后不良(根据恒氏标准)的晚期RCC患者的基线人口统计学数据、接受的治疗、毒性(主要为3级和4级)、缓解率(RR)和生存率。
最终纳入60例患者(男性43例,女性17例),中位年龄53岁。中位东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS)为1,透明细胞是主要组织学类型(63.3%),46.7%的患者有超过2个转移部位。索拉非尼、舒尼替尼、替西罗莫司和帕唑帕尼分别用于治疗43.3%、36.7%、8.3%和6.7%的患者,3例患者接受了初始最佳支持治疗。常见不良事件包括皮疹(31.5%)、手足皮肤反应(2级和3级 - 30.8%)、黏膜炎(26.3%)、高血压(24.5%)和血脂异常(22.8%)。41例患者可评估缓解情况 - 观察到的总缓解率为15%,临床获益率为50%。中位无进展生存期为5.78个月(4.67 - 6.89),中位总生存期(OS)为10.05个月(7.31 - 12.79)。
我们研究中的大多数预后不良的转移性RCC患者接受了TKIs治疗,生存结果似乎表明,在印度环境下,这种策略是替西罗莫司的一种可行替代方案。