Suppr超能文献

使用互样本熵和互重正化关联分析测量节律时间序列的耦合。

Measuring Coupling of Rhythmical Time Series Using Cross Sample Entropy and Cross Recurrence Quantification Analysis.

机构信息

MORE Foundation, 18444 N. 25th Ave, Suite 110, Phoenix, AZ 85023, USA.

Center for Research in Human Movement Variability, University of Nebraska Omaha, 6160 University Drive, Omaha, NE 68182-0860, USA.

出版信息

Comput Math Methods Med. 2017;2017:7960467. doi: 10.1155/2017/7960467. Epub 2017 Oct 22.

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to compare and contrast the use of cross sample entropy (xSE) and cross recurrence quantification analysis (cRQA) measures for the assessment of coupling of rhythmical patterns. Measures were assessed using simulated signals with regular, chaotic, and random fluctuations in frequency, amplitude, and a combination of both. Biological data were studied as models of normal and abnormal locomotor-respiratory coupling. Nine signal types were generated for seven frequency ratios. Fifteen patients with COPD (abnormal coupling) and twenty-one healthy controls (normal coupling) walked on a treadmill at three speeds while breathing and walking were recorded. xSE and the cRQA measures of percent determinism, maximum line, mean line, and entropy were quantified for both the simulated and experimental data. In the simulated data, xSE, percent determinism, and entropy were influenced by the frequency manipulation. The 1 : 1 frequency ratio was different than other frequency ratios for almost all measures and/or manipulations. The patients with COPD used a 2 : 3 ratio more often and xSE, percent determinism, maximum line, mean line, and cRQA entropy were able to discriminate between the groups. Analysis of the effects of walking speed indicated that all measures were able to discriminate between speeds.

摘要

本研究旨在比较和对比交叉样本熵(xSE)和交叉重正化分析(cRQA)测量方法在评估节律模式耦合中的应用。使用具有规则、混沌和随机频率、幅度波动以及两者组合的模拟信号来评估测量方法。生物数据被用作正常和异常运动-呼吸耦合的模型。为七个频率比生成了九种信号类型。15 名 COPD 患者(异常耦合)和 21 名健康对照者(正常耦合)在跑步机上以三种速度行走,同时记录呼吸和行走。对模拟和实验数据都进行了 xSE 和 cRQA 的确定性百分比、最大线、平均线和熵的测量。在模拟数据中,xSE、确定性百分比和熵受到频率操作的影响。1:1 的频率比与其他频率比几乎在所有测量值和/或操作上都不同。COPD 患者更常使用 2:3 比,xSE、确定性百分比、最大线、平均线和 cRQA 熵能够区分两组。对行走速度影响的分析表明,所有测量值都能够区分速度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9f8/5671691/0682a0b40567/CMMM2017-7960467.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验