• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩关节置换术中的抗生素间隔物:带柄与无柄植入物的比较

Antibiotic Spacers in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison of Stemmed and Stemless Implants.

作者信息

Padegimas Eric M, Narzikul Alexia, Lawrence Cassandra, Hendy Benjamin A, Abboud Joseph A, Ramsey Matthew L, Williams Gerald R, Namdari Surena

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Surg. 2017 Dec;9(4):489-496. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.489. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

DOI:10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.489
PMID:29201302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5705308/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic spacers in shoulder periprosthetic joint infection deliver antibiotics locally and provide temporary stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences between stemmed and stemless spacers.

METHODS

All spacers placed from 2011 to 2013 were identified. Stemless spacers were made by creating a spherical ball of cement placed in the joint space. Stemmed spacers had some portion in the humeral canal. Operative time, complications, reimplantation, reinfection, and range of motion were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 37 spacers placed: 22 were stemless and 15 were stemmed. The stemless spacer population was older (70.9 ± 7.8 years vs. 62.8 ± 8.4 years, = 0.006). The groups had a similar percentage of each gender (stemless group, 45% male vs. stemmed group, 40% male; = 0.742), body mass index (stemless group, 29.1 ± 6.4 kg/m vs. stemmed group, 31.5 ± 8.3 kg/m; = 0.354) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (stemless group, 4.2 ± 1.2 vs. stemmed group, 4.2 ± 1.7; = 0.958). Operative time was similar (stemless group, 127.5 ± 37.1 minutes vs. stemmed group, 130.5 ± 39.4 minutes). Two stemless group patients had self-resolving radial nerve palsies. Within the stemless group, 15 of 22 (68.2%) underwent reimplantation with 14 of 15 having forward elevation of 109° ± 23°. Within the stemmed group, 12 of 15 (80.0%, = 0.427) underwent reimplantation with 8 of 12 having forward elevation of 94° ± 43° (range, 30° to 150°; = 0.300). Two stemmed group patients had axillary nerve palsies, one of which self-resolved but the other did not. One patient sustained dislocation of reverse shoulder arthroplasty after reimplantation. One stemless group patient required an open reduction and glenosphere exchange of dislocated reverse shoulder arthroplasty at 6 weeks after reimplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Stemmed and stemless spacers had similar clinical outcomes. When analyzing all antibiotic spacers, over 70% were converted to revision arthroplasties. The results of this study do not suggest superiority of either stemmed or stemless antibiotic spacers.

摘要

背景

肩部人工关节周围感染中的抗生素间隔物可局部输送抗生素并提供临时稳定性。本研究的目的是评估有柄和无柄间隔物之间的差异。

方法

确定了2011年至2013年植入的所有间隔物。无柄间隔物是通过在关节间隙中制作一个水泥球制成的。有柄间隔物在肱骨髓腔内有一定部分。分析了手术时间、并发症、再次植入、再感染和活动范围。

结果

共植入37个间隔物:22个无柄,15个有柄。无柄间隔物组患者年龄更大(70.9±7.8岁对62.8±8.4岁,P = 0.006)。两组的男女比例相似(无柄组45%为男性,有柄组40%为男性;P = 0.742),体重指数相似(无柄组29.1±6.4kg/m²对有柄组31.5±8.3kg/m²;P = 0.354),Charlson合并症指数相似(无柄组4.2±1.2对有柄组4.2±1.7;P = 0.958)。手术时间相似(无柄组127.5±37.1分钟对有柄组130.5±39.4分钟)。无柄组有2例患者出现自行缓解的桡神经麻痹。在无柄组中,22例中有15例(68.2%)接受了再次植入,其中15例中有14例前屈抬高角度为109°±23°。在有柄组中,15例中有12例(80.0%,P = 0.427)接受了再次植入,其中12例中有8例前屈抬高角度为94°±43°(范围30°至150°;P = 0.300)。有柄组有2例患者出现腋神经麻痹,其中1例自行缓解,另1例未缓解。1例患者在再次植入后发生反肩关节置换脱位。1例无柄组患者在再次植入后6周需要对脱位的反肩关节置换进行切开复位和球窝关节置换。

结论

有柄和无柄间隔物的临床结果相似。在分析所有抗生素间隔物时,超过70%最终进行了关节翻修手术。本研究结果并不表明有柄或无柄抗生素间隔物具有优越性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c19/5705308/5f9f151f3964/cios-9-489-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c19/5705308/257643886065/cios-9-489-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c19/5705308/5f9f151f3964/cios-9-489-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c19/5705308/257643886065/cios-9-489-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c19/5705308/5f9f151f3964/cios-9-489-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Antibiotic Spacers in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Comparison of Stemmed and Stemless Implants.肩关节置换术中的抗生素间隔物:带柄与无柄植入物的比较
Clin Orthop Surg. 2017 Dec;9(4):489-496. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.489. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
2
Management of infected shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of treatment strategies.感染性肩关节置换术后的处理:治疗策略比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Sep;28(9):1658-1665. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Staged Revision With Antibiotic Spacers for Shoulder Prosthetic Joint Infections Yields High Infection Control.使用抗生素间隔物分期翻修治疗肩关节人工关节感染可有效控制感染。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):146-152. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000049.
4
Functional midterm follow-up comparison of stemless total shoulder prostheses versus conventional stemmed anatomic shoulder prostheses using a 3D-motion-analysis.使用三维运动分析对无柄全肩关节假体与传统有柄解剖型肩关节假体进行功能中期随访比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Nov 21;18(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1835-3.
5
Long-term survival and failure analysis of anatomical stemmed and stemless shoulder arthroplasties.解剖型柄和无柄肩关节置换术的长期生存和失败分析。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jul;103-B(7):1292-1300. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-0915.R3.
6
Does the stemless reverse arthroplasty compare to a conventional stemmed implant? Clinical and radiographic evaluation at 2 years' minimum follow-up.无柄反置关节成形术与传统柄假体相比如何?至少 2 年的临床和影像学随访评估。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Sep;33(9):1938-1945. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
7
Radiographic comparison of eccentric stemmed vs. concentric stemless prosthetic humeral head positioning after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.解剖型全肩关节置换术后偏心柄与同心无柄人工肱骨头假体定位的影像学比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Jan;33(1):90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.037. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
8
Is stemless total shoulder arthroplasty indicated in elderly patients?无柄全肩关节置换术适用于老年患者吗?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Feb;32(2):260-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
9
Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无柄解剖型全肩关节置换术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Sep;29(9):1928-1937. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.022. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
10
Revision for a failed reverse: a 12-year review of a lateralized implant.失败翻修术:对侧植入物的12年回顾
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 May;25(5):e115-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.09.027. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
One- vs. Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Shoulder Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.人工关节周围肩部感染的一期与二期翻修术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 May 14;13(5):440. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13050440.
2
Creation of a Custom-Length, Humeral Antibiotic Cement Spacer for Use in Treatment of Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection.定制长度的肱骨抗生素骨水泥间隔器在肩关节假体周围感染治疗中的应用
Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Jan 15;10(2):e481-e486. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.10.027. eCollection 2021 Feb.
3
Advanced septic arthritis of the shoulder treated by a two-stage arthroplasty.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as primary versus revision procedure for proximal humerus fractures.作为肱骨近端骨折初次手术与翻修手术的反式全肩关节置换术的疗效
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jul;25(7):1133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
2
Early Versus Late Culture Growth of Propionibacterium acnes in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty.痤疮丙酸杆菌在翻修肩关节置换术中的早期与晚期培养生长情况
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Jul 15;97(14):1149-58. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00881.
3
Use of a Functional Antibiotic Spacer in Treating Infected Shoulder Arthroplasty.
采用两阶段关节置换术治疗的晚期肩关节化脓性关节炎。
World J Orthop. 2019 Oct 18;10(10):356-363. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i10.356.
4
Outcomes of Shoulder Arthroplasty Performed for Postinfectious Arthritis.感染后关节炎行肩关节置换术的疗效
Clin Orthop Surg. 2018 Sep;10(3):344-351. doi: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.3.344. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
使用功能性抗生素间隔物治疗感染性肩关节置换术
Orthopedics. 2015 Jun;38(6):e512-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150603-60.
4
Infection after primary anatomic versus primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.初次解剖型与初次反向全肩关节置换术后感染情况
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Aug;24(8):1296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.12.036. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
5
Management of complications after total shoulder arthroplasty.全肩关节置换术后并发症的处理。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015 Mar;8(1):83-91. doi: 10.1007/s12178-014-9251-x.
6
Periprosthetic shoulder infection in the United States: incidence and economic burden.美国人工肩关节周围感染:发病率及经济负担
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 May;24(5):741-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.11.044. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
7
Revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty with retention of the humeral component.肩关节置换术中保留肱骨头的翻修术。
Acta Orthop. 2013 Oct;84(5):473-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.842433. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
8
Periprosthetic joint infection: Current concept.人工关节周围感染:当前概念
Indian J Orthop. 2013 Jan;47(1):10-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.106884.
9
Surgical Techniques for Staged Revision of the Chronically Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Surg Technol Int. 2011 Dec;21:204-11.
10
Do dynamic cement-on-cement knee spacers provide better function and activity during two-stage exchange?在两阶段翻修中,动态水泥-水泥膝关节间隔器是否能提供更好的功能和活动度?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Sep;470(9):2599-604. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2332-5. Epub 2012 Apr 4.