Bruno John F, Rand Tatyana A, Emery Nancy C, Bertness Mark D
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Northern Plains Agricultural Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Sidney, MT, United States of America.
PeerJ. 2017 Nov 29;5:e4049. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4049. eCollection 2017.
Intra- and interspecific interactions can be broken down into facilitative and competitive components. The net interaction between two organisms is simply the sum of these counteracting elements. Disentangling the positive and negative components of species interactions is a critical step in advancing our understanding of how the interaction between organisms shift along physical and biotic gradients. We performed a manipulative field experiment to quantify the positive and negative components of the interactions between a perennial forb, , and three dominant, matrix-forming grasses and rushes in a New England salt marsh. Specifically, we asked whether positive and negative interaction components: (1) are unique or redundant across three matrix-forming species (two grasses; and , and one rush; ), and (2) change across life stages (seedling, juvenile, and adult). For adult the strength of the facilitative component of the matrix-forb interaction was stronger than the competitive component for two of the three matrix species, leading to net positive interactions. There was no statistically significant variation among matrix species in their net or component effects. We found little difference in the effects of on at later life-history stages; interaction component strengths did not differ between juveniles and adults. However, mortality of seedlings in neighbor removal plots was 100%, indicating a particularly strong and critical facilitative effect of matrix species on this forb during the earliest life stages. Overall, our results indicate that matrix forming grasses and rushes have important, yet largely redundant, positive net effects on performance across its life cycle. Studies that untangle various components of interactions and their contingencies are critical to both expanding our basic understanding of community organization, and predicting how natural communities and their component parts will respond to environmental change.
种内和种间相互作用可细分为促进性和竞争性成分。两个生物体之间的净相互作用仅仅是这些相互抵消的因素之和。理清物种相互作用的正、负成分是推进我们对生物体之间的相互作用如何沿着物理和生物梯度变化的理解的关键一步。我们进行了一项控制性田间实验,以量化一种多年生草本植物与新英格兰盐沼中三种占主导地位的、形成基质的禾本科植物和灯心草之间相互作用的正、负成分。具体来说,我们研究了正、负相互作用成分:(1)在三种形成基质的物种(两种禾本科植物;[具体物种1]和[具体物种2],以及一种灯心草;[具体物种3])中是独特的还是冗余的,以及(2)在[目标植物]的不同生命阶段(幼苗、幼体和成体)是否发生变化。对于成年[目标植物],在三种基质物种中的两种中,基质 - 草本植物相互作用的促进性成分强度强于竞争性成分,导致净正相互作用。基质物种在其净效应或成分效应方面没有统计学上的显著差异。我们发现在后期生命史阶段[目标植物]对[其他植物]的影响差异不大;幼体和成体之间的相互作用成分强度没有差异。然而,去除邻体地块中幼苗的死亡率为100%,这表明在最早的生命阶段,基质物种对这种草本植物有特别强烈且关键的促进作用。总体而言,我们的结果表明,形成基质的禾本科植物和灯心草在[目标植物]的整个生命周期中对其表现具有重要但在很大程度上冗余的正净效应。理清相互作用的各种成分及其偶然性的研究对于扩展我们对群落组织的基本理解以及预测自然群落及其组成部分将如何应对环境变化都至关重要。