Tsay Annie J, Langan Sara, Simon Scott
Medical Student, Penn State University College of Medicine.
Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center.
Cureus. 2017 Sep 29;9(9):e1732. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1732.
Multiple imaging modalities are available to evaluate aneurysms post-flow diverter (FD) placement. Though digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard imaging modality post-FD placement, it is not perfect, and neither are other techniques, including contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We present a case of a 73-year-old woman with a right internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm treated with a pipeline embolization device (PED). Initial follow-up post-PED placement by three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D-TOF) MRA demonstrated aneurysm occlusion, which was confirmed by computed tomography angiography (CTA) and CE-MRA in subsequent follow-up appointments. However, repeat CE-MRA two years later suggested recanalization of the aneurysm. After discussion with neuroradiologists and follow-up with a dynamic MRA, this finding was determined to be false. These findings shed light on the potential pitfall of using CE-MRA alone or any single imaging modality in the assessment of aneurysms post-PED placement. Our case report explores various imaging modalities used in the assessment of aneurysms post-PED placement and highlights the need to use multiple techniques for an accurate assessment.
有多种成像方式可用于评估血流导向装置(FD)置入术后的动脉瘤。尽管数字减影血管造影(DSA)是FD置入术后的金标准成像方式,但它并不完美,其他技术,包括对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)和磁共振成像(MRI)也不完美。我们报告一例73岁女性,其右侧颈内动脉(ICA)动脉瘤采用密网支架(PED)治疗。PED置入术后最初通过三维时间飞跃(3D-TOF)MRA进行的随访显示动脉瘤闭塞,这在随后的随访中通过计算机断层血管造影(CTA)和CE-MRA得到证实。然而,两年后重复CE-MRA提示动脉瘤再通。在与神经放射科医生讨论并进行动态MRA随访后,确定这一发现是假阳性。这些发现揭示了在评估PED置入术后动脉瘤时单独使用CE-MRA或任何单一成像方式的潜在陷阱。我们的病例报告探讨了用于评估PED置入术后动脉瘤的各种成像方式,并强调了使用多种技术进行准确评估的必要性。