Siddiqi Kamran, Vidyasagaran Aishwarya Lakshmi, Readshaw Anne, Croucher Ray
Department of Health Sciences, The University of York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Curr Addict Rep. 2017;4(4):503-510. doi: 10.1007/s40429-017-0166-7. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
Globally, over 300 million people consume diverse smokeless tobacco (ST) products. They are addictive, cause cancer, increased cardiovascular mortality risks and poor pregnancy outcomes.
To identify gaps in implementing key ST demand-reduction measures, focused literature reviews were conducted and findings synthesized according to relevant WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Articles.
The literature supports implementation of ST demand-reduction measures. For taxation, labelling and packaging, most administrations have weaker policies for ST than cigarettes. Capacity to regulate ST contents and offer cessation support is lacking. There is poor compliance with bans on ST advertising, promotion and sponsorship.
The literature on implementation of WHO FCTC for ST is limited. Although strengths of ST demand-control activities are currently identifiable from available literature, full implementation of FCTC is lacking. A wider evidence-based response to WHO FCTC is proposed, particularly for countries facing the greatest disease burdens.
全球有超过3亿人消费各种无烟烟草(ST)产品。这些产品会上瘾,导致癌症、增加心血管疾病死亡风险并造成不良妊娠结局。
为了找出在实施关键的无烟烟草需求减少措施方面存在的差距,我们进行了重点文献综述,并根据世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》(FCTC)的相关条款对研究结果进行了综合分析。
文献支持实施无烟烟草需求减少措施。在税收、标签和包装方面,大多数管理部门对无烟烟草的政策比对香烟的政策更宽松。缺乏监管无烟烟草成分和提供戒烟支持的能力。对无烟烟草广告、促销和赞助的禁令执行情况不佳。
关于世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》在无烟烟草方面实施情况的文献有限。尽管目前可以从现有文献中确定无烟烟草需求控制活动的优势,但《烟草控制框架公约》的全面实施仍存在不足。建议针对世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》采取更广泛的基于证据的应对措施,特别是对于面临最大疾病负担的国家。