Hu Jing, Liu Shuo, Liu Weihong, Zhang Huina, Chen Jing, Shang Hongcai
Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100010, China.
Key Laboratory for Internal Chinese Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100700, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Nov;5(21):420. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.06.06.
The development of a scientific evaluation tool is a prerequisite to reflect the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). At present, separate analysis of each outcome is the most commonly used method in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TCM, while this method has been reported to have some limitations. Combination evaluation of multiple primary outcomes including diseases and symptoms can reflect the efficacy of TCM comprehensively and objectively. Now, several multivariate statistical methods have been proposed to analyze RCTs with multiple clinical outcomes. In this article, we highlighted the two commonly used methods, global statistical test (GST) methodology and alpha-adjustment procedures, and introduced an evaluation mode. First, we used one stage adaptive adjustment strategy to estimate the correlation among multiple primary outcomes in blindness, which can resolve the inappropriate correlation estimation among multiple primary outcomes, then we introduced an adaptation of the Bonferroni procedure which can account for correlated data to calculate the alpha of individual outcome. GST using O'Brien ranking procedure and the corresponding global treatment effect (GTE) measure were used to assess the treatment's global impact. We will conduct a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with compound Danshen dripping pills for stable angina to explore establishing the evaluation mode. We hope that the introduction of this approach can provide methodological aid for the assessment of therapeutic effect of TCM.
科学评估工具的开发是反映中医药疗效的前提条件。目前,在中医药随机对照试验(RCT)中,对每个结局进行单独分析是最常用的方法,但据报道该方法存在一些局限性。对包括疾病和症状在内的多个主要结局进行综合评估能够全面、客观地反映中医药的疗效。如今,已经提出了几种多元统计方法来分析具有多个临床结局的RCT。在本文中,我们重点介绍了两种常用方法,全局统计检验(GST)方法和α调整程序,并介绍了一种评估模式。首先,我们采用一阶段自适应调整策略来估计盲法中多个主要结局之间的相关性,这可以解决多个主要结局之间相关性估计不当的问题,然后我们引入了一种Bonferroni程序的变体,该变体可以考虑相关数据来计算单个结局的α值。使用采用奥布赖恩排序程序的GST和相应的全局治疗效应(GTE)测量方法来评估治疗的整体影响。我们将进行一项关于复方丹参滴丸治疗稳定型心绞痛的随机、双盲、对照试验,以探索建立该评估模式。我们希望这种方法的引入能够为中医药治疗效果的评估提供方法学上的帮助。