• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1994 - 2011年津巴布韦孕产妇医疗保健利用中与社会经济地位相关的不平等现象的演变

The evolution of socioeconomic status-related inequalities in maternal health care utilization: evidence from Zimbabwe, 1994-2011.

作者信息

Makate Marshall, Makate Clifton

机构信息

Department of Economics, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY 12222 USA.

UNEP Tongji Institute of Environment for Sustainable Development, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Glob Health Res Policy. 2017 Jan 5;2:1. doi: 10.1186/s41256-016-0021-8. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s41256-016-0021-8
PMID:29202069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5683384/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inequalities in maternal health care are pervasive in the developing world, a fact that has led to questions about the extent of these disparities across socioeconomic groups. Despite a growing literature on maternal health across Sub-Saharan African countries, relatively little is known about the evolution of these inequalities over time for specific countries. This study sought to quantify and explain the observed differences in prenatal care use and professional delivery assistance in Zimbabwe.

METHODS

The empirical analysis uses four rounds of the nationwide Zimbabwe Demographic and Health Survey administered in 1994, 1999, 2005/06 and 2010/11. Two binary indicators were used as measures of maternal health care utilization; (1) the receipt of four or more antenatal care visits and (2) receiving professional delivery assistance for the most recent pregnancy. We measure inequalities in maternal health care use using the Erreygers corrected concentration index. A decomposition analysis was conducted to determine the underlying drivers of the measured disparities.

RESULTS

The computed concentration indices for professional delivery assistance and prenatal care reveal a mostly pro-rich distribution of inequalities between 1994 and 2011. Particularly, the concentration index [95% confidence interval] for the receipt of prenatal care was 0.111 [0.056, 0.171] in 2005/06 and 0.094 [0.057, 0.138] in 2010/11. For professional delivery assistance, the concentration index stood at 0.286 [0.244, 0.329] in 2005/06 and 0.324 [0.283, 0.366] in 2010/11. The pro-rich inequality was also increasing in both rural and urban areas over time. The decomposition exercise revealed that wealth, education, religion and information access were the underlying drivers of the observed inequalities in maternal health care.

CONCLUSIONS

In Zimbabwe, socioeconomic disparities in maternal health care use are mostly pro-rich and have widened over time regardless of the location of residence. Overall, we established that inequalities in wealth and education are amongst the top drivers of the observed disparities in maternal health care. These findings suggest that addressing inequalities in maternal health care utilization requires coordinated public policies targeting the more poor and vulnerable segments of the population in Zimbabwe.

摘要

背景

孕产妇保健方面的不平等在发展中世界普遍存在,这一事实引发了关于这些差距在不同社会经济群体间的程度的问题。尽管关于撒哈拉以南非洲国家孕产妇健康的文献越来越多,但对于特定国家这些不平等随时间的演变情况却知之甚少。本研究旨在量化并解释在津巴布韦观察到的产前护理利用和专业分娩协助方面的差异。

方法

实证分析使用了1994年、1999年、2005/06年和2010/11年在津巴布韦全国范围内进行的四轮人口与健康调查。使用两个二元指标作为孕产妇保健利用的衡量标准;(1)接受四次或更多次产前检查,以及(2)最近一次怀孕时接受专业分娩协助。我们使用埃雷格斯校正集中指数来衡量孕产妇保健利用方面的不平等。进行了分解分析以确定所测差距的潜在驱动因素。

结果

计算得出的专业分娩协助和产前护理的集中指数显示,1994年至2011年间不平等现象大多有利于富人。特别是,2005/06年接受产前护理的集中指数[95%置信区间]为0.111[0.056,0.171],2010/11年为0.094[0.057,0.138]。对于专业分娩协助,2005/06年集中指数为0.286[0.244,0.329],2010/11年为0.324[0.283,0.366]。随着时间推移,有利于富人的不平等在农村和城市地区也都在增加。分解分析表明,财富、教育、宗教和信息获取是观察到的孕产妇保健不平等的潜在驱动因素。

结论

在津巴布韦,孕产妇保健利用方面的社会经济差距大多有利于富人,且无论居住地点如何,都随时间而扩大。总体而言,我们确定财富和教育方面的不平等是观察到的孕产妇保健差距的主要驱动因素之一。这些发现表明,解决孕产妇保健利用方面的不平等需要针对津巴布韦更贫困和脆弱人群制定协调一致的公共政策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae92/5683384/2333cded2ea0/41256_2016_21_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae92/5683384/072785f36a45/41256_2016_21_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae92/5683384/0b27a3966ae3/41256_2016_21_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae92/5683384/a7aafccfac13/41256_2016_21_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae92/5683384/2333cded2ea0/41256_2016_21_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae92/5683384/072785f36a45/41256_2016_21_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae92/5683384/0b27a3966ae3/41256_2016_21_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae92/5683384/a7aafccfac13/41256_2016_21_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae92/5683384/2333cded2ea0/41256_2016_21_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The evolution of socioeconomic status-related inequalities in maternal health care utilization: evidence from Zimbabwe, 1994-2011.1994 - 2011年津巴布韦孕产妇医疗保健利用中与社会经济地位相关的不平等现象的演变
Glob Health Res Policy. 2017 Jan 5;2:1. doi: 10.1186/s41256-016-0021-8. eCollection 2017.
2
Decomposing maternal socioeconomic inequalities in Zimbabwe; leaving no woman behind.剖析津巴布韦孕产妇社会经济不平等现象;不让任何妇女掉队。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 23;22(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04571-9.
3
Socioeconomic inequalities in food insecurity and malnutrition among under-five children: within and between-group inequalities in Zimbabwe.津巴布韦五岁以下儿童粮食不安全和营养不良方面的社会经济不平等:群体内部和群体之间的不平等
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 4;20(1):1199. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09295-z.
4
Is socioeconomic inequality in antenatal care coverage widening or reducing between- and within-socioeconomic groups? A case of 19 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲19个国家的产前护理覆盖率在社会经济群体之间和群体内部的社会经济不平等是在扩大还是在缩小?
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Apr 12;23:101402. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101402. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of maternal healthcare services in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚孕产妇保健服务利用方面的社会经济不平等现象。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 22;17(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2298-9.
6
Social inequalities in the utilization of maternal care in Bangladesh: Have they widened or narrowed in recent years?孟加拉国孕产妇保健利用方面的社会不平等:近年来这些不平等是扩大了还是缩小了?
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Dec 10;13:120. doi: 10.1186/s12939-014-0120-4.
7
Sub-regional disparities in the use of antenatal care service in Mauritania: findings from nationally representative demographic and health surveys (2011-2015).毛里塔尼亚地区间产前护理服务利用的差异:全国代表性人口与健康调查(2011-2015 年)的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):1818. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11836-z.
8
Delivery channels and socioeconomic inequalities in coverage of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health interventions: analysis of 36 cross-sectional surveys in low-income and middle-income countries.生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施的提供渠道和社会经济不平等:对低收入和中等收入国家的 36 项横断面调查的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Aug;9(8):e1101-e1109. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00204-7. Epub 2021 May 26.
9
Socioeconomic inequalities in the 90-90-90 target, among people living with HIV in 12 sub-Saharan African countries - Implications for achieving the 95-95-95 target - Analysis of population-based surveys.撒哈拉以南非洲12个国家艾滋病毒感染者中90-90-90目标的社会经济不平等——对实现95-95-95目标的影响——基于人群调查的分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Sep 17;53:101652. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101652. eCollection 2022 Nov.
10
Inequalities in maternal health care utilization in sub-Saharan African countries: a multiyear and multi-country analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲国家孕产妇保健服务利用的不平等:多年度和多国分析
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 8;10(4):e0120922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120922. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Wealth disparities in maternal health service utilization among women of reproductive age in Ethiopia: findings from the mini-EDHS 2019.埃塞俄比亚育龄妇女在孕产妇健康服务利用方面的贫富差距:2019 年微型埃塞俄比亚 DHS 调查结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 6;24(1):1034. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11515-w.
2
Closing the gap? Results-based financing and socio-economic-related inequalities in maternal health outcomes in Zimbabwe.弥合差距?津巴布韦基于结果的融资与社会经济相关不平等对孕产妇健康结局的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Nov 14;39(10):1022-1031. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae080.
3
Antenatal care coverage and early childhood mortality in Zimbabwe: new interpretations from nationally representative household surveys.

本文引用的文献

1
The causal effect of increased primary schooling on child mortality in Malawi: Universal primary education as a natural experiment.马拉维小学教育普及对儿童死亡率的因果效应:以普及小学教育作为一项自然实验
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Nov;168:72-83. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
2
Praying until Death: Apostolicism, Delays and Maternal Mortality in Zimbabwe.祈祷至死亡:津巴布韦的使徒信仰、延误与孕产妇死亡率
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 10;11(8):e0160170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160170. eCollection 2016.
3
conindex: Estimation of concentration indices.
津巴布韦的产前保健覆盖率与儿童早期死亡率:来自全国代表性家庭调查的新解释。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Jun 1;39(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae039.
4
Predictors of maternal health services uptake in West African region: a multilevel multinomial regression analysis of demographic health survey reports.西非地区孕产妇卫生服务利用的影响因素:基于人口健康调查报告的多水平多项分类回归分析。
Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 6;21(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01782-5.
5
Evolution in key indicators of maternal and child health across the wealth gradient in 41 sub-Saharan African countries, 1986-2019.41 个撒哈拉以南非洲国家在财富梯度上母婴健康关键指标的演变,1986-2019 年。
BMC Med. 2024 Jan 8;22(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03183-0.
6
Global achievement of maternal health-related sustainable development goals targets among women exposed to intimate partner violence.全球范围内,遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性在实现与母婴健康相关的可持续发展目标方面的进展。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Aug 9;23(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02577-9.
7
Is socioeconomic inequality in antenatal care coverage widening or reducing between- and within-socioeconomic groups? A case of 19 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲19个国家的产前护理覆盖率在社会经济群体之间和群体内部的社会经济不平等是在扩大还是在缩小?
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Apr 12;23:101402. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101402. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Factors that affect the utilisation of maternal healthcare in the Mchinji District of Malawi.影响马拉维姆钦吉地区孕产妇保健利用的因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279613. eCollection 2022.
9
Inequalities in maternal healthcare use in Sierra Leone: Evidence from the 2008-2019 Demographic and Health Surveys.塞拉利昂产妇保健利用方面的不平等:来自 2008-2019 年人口与健康调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 13;17(10):e0276102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276102. eCollection 2022.
10
Explaining socioeconomic inequality in cervical cancer screening uptake in Malawi.解释马拉维宫颈癌筛查参与度的社会经济不平等现象。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 18;22(1):1376. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13750-4.
浓度指数:浓度指数的估计。
Stata J. 2016;16(1):112-138.
4
Inequality and inequity in healthcare utilization in urban Nepal: a cross-sectional observational study.尼泊尔城市地区医疗保健利用的不平等与不公平:一项横断面观察性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Sep;31(7):817-24. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv137. Epub 2016 Feb 7.
5
Maternal education and child mortality in Zimbabwe.津巴布韦的孕产妇教育与儿童死亡率
J Health Econ. 2015 Dec;44:97-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
6
Inequalities in maternal health care utilization in sub-Saharan African countries: a multiyear and multi-country analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲国家孕产妇保健服务利用的不平等:多年度和多国分析
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 8;10(4):e0120922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120922. eCollection 2015.
7
Social inequality in infant mortality: what explains variation across low and middle income countries?婴儿死亡率的社会不平等:低、中收入国家之间差异的原因是什么?
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jan;101:36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
8
Income-related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries.18 个选定的经合组织国家医疗服务利用的与收入相关的不平等和不公平。
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;16(1):21-33. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0546-4. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
9
Does the distribution of healthcare utilization match needs in Africa?非洲的医疗保健利用分布与需求匹配吗?
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Oct;29(7):921-37. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt074. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
10
Socioeconomic inequality in domains of health: results from the World Health Surveys.健康领域的社会经济不平等:来自世界卫生调查的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 19;12:198. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-198.