• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥合差距?津巴布韦基于结果的融资与社会经济相关不平等对孕产妇健康结局的影响。

Closing the gap? Results-based financing and socio-economic-related inequalities in maternal health outcomes in Zimbabwe.

机构信息

Health Economics and Data Analytics, School of Population Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.

School of Economics and Finance, University of the Witwatersrand, P Bag 3, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2024 Nov 14;39(10):1022-1031. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae080.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/czae080
PMID:39185590
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11562138/
Abstract

The results-based financing (RBF) programme, first implemented in Zimbabwe in 2011 and gradually expanded to other districts, aimed to address disparities in maternal health outcomes by improving the utilization of health services. This study leverages the staggered rollout of the programme as a quasi-experimental design to assess its impact on asset wealth-related inequalities in selected maternal health outcomes. The objective is to determine whether RBF can effectively reduce these disparities and promote equitable healthcare access. We employ an extended two-way fixed effects (ETWFE) model to exploit temporal variation in RBF implementation as well as individual-level variation in birth timing for identification. Utilizing pooled cross-sectional and nationally representative data from the Zimbabwe demographic and health surveys collected between 1999 and 2015, our analysis reveals significant reductions in relative and absolute maternal health inequalities, especially in the frequency and timing of prenatal care, delivery by caesarean section and family planning. Specifically, the RBF programme is associated with reductions in disparities for completing at least four or more prenatal care visits (-0.026, P < 0.01), first-trimester prenatal care (-0.033, P < 0.01), delivery by caesarean section (-0.028, P < 0.005) and family planning (-0.033, P < 0.005). Additionally, the programme is associated with improved prenatal care quality, as evidenced by progress on the prenatal care quality index (-0.040, P < 0.01). These effects are more pronounced among lower socio-economic groups in RBF districts, highlighting RBF's potential to promote equitable healthcare access. Our findings advocate for targeted policy interventions prioritizing expanding access to critical maternal health services in underserved areas and incorporating equity-focused measures within RBF frameworks to ensure inclusive and effective healthcare delivery in Zimbabwe and other low-income countries.

摘要

基于成果的融资(RBF)计划于 2011 年首次在津巴布韦实施,并逐步扩展到其他地区,旨在通过改善卫生服务的利用来解决孕产妇健康结果的差异。本研究利用该计划的交错推出作为准实验设计,评估其对选定孕产妇健康结果与资产财富相关不平等的影响。目的是确定 RBF 是否可以有效地减少这些差距并促进公平的医疗保健获取。我们采用扩展的双向固定效应(ETWFE)模型来利用 RBF 实施的时间变化以及出生时间的个体差异进行识别。利用津巴布韦人口与健康调查在 1999 年至 2015 年期间收集的 pooled 横截面和全国代表性数据进行分析,我们的分析表明,相对和绝对孕产妇健康不平等有了显著减少,特别是在产前护理的频率和时间、剖腹产分娩和计划生育方面。具体而言,RBF 计划与减少至少进行四次或更多次产前护理访问的差距相关(-0.026,P < 0.01)、第一孕期产前护理(-0.033,P < 0.01)、剖腹产分娩(-0.028,P < 0.005)和计划生育(-0.033,P < 0.005)。此外,该计划与产前护理质量的提高有关,这表现在产前护理质量指数上的进展(-0.040,P < 0.01)。在 RBF 地区的社会经济地位较低的群体中,这些影响更为明显,突显了 RBF 促进公平医疗保健获取的潜力。我们的研究结果提倡采取有针对性的政策干预措施,优先扩大在服务不足地区获得关键孕产妇健康服务的机会,并在 RBF 框架内纳入注重公平的措施,以确保津巴布韦和其他低收入国家提供包容性和有效的医疗保健。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecba/11562138/b8bf3a83fad1/czae080f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecba/11562138/b8bf3a83fad1/czae080f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ecba/11562138/b8bf3a83fad1/czae080f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Closing the gap? Results-based financing and socio-economic-related inequalities in maternal health outcomes in Zimbabwe.弥合差距?津巴布韦基于结果的融资与社会经济相关不平等对孕产妇健康结局的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Nov 14;39(10):1022-1031. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae080.
2
Balancing the scales? Evaluating the impact of results-based financing on maternal health outcomes and related inequality of opportunity in Zimbabwe.平衡天平?评估基于结果的融资对津巴布韦母婴健康结果和相关机会不平等的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Oct;359:117257. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117257. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
3
Trends in national and subnational wealth related inequalities in use of maternal health care services in Nepal: an analysis using demographic and health surveys (2001-2016).尼泊尔全国及地方层面孕产妇保健服务利用方面与财富相关的不平等趋势:一项基于人口与健康调查(2001 - 2016年)的分析
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 4;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10066-z.
4
Decomposing maternal socioeconomic inequalities in Zimbabwe; leaving no woman behind.剖析津巴布韦孕产妇社会经济不平等现象;不让任何妇女掉队。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 23;22(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04571-9.
5
Similarities in socioeconomic disparities and inequalities in women's nutritional status and health care in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India, and Nigeria.孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、印度和尼日利亚在妇女营养状况和医疗保健方面的社会经济差距与不平等现象的相似之处。
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2439165. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2439165. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
6
Do free caesarean section policies increase inequalities in Benin and Mali?免费剖宫产政策是否会加剧贝宁和马里的不平等?
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 5;17(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0789-x.
7
Is economic inequality in maternal and child healthcare decreasing in India? Trends between 2005-2006, 2015-2016 and 2019-2021.印度母婴保健领域的经济不平等现象正在减少吗?2005 - 2006年、2015 - 2016年和2019 - 2021年期间的趋势。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):e084328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084328.
8
Coverage and equity in reproductive and maternal health interventions in Brazil: impressive progress following the implementation of the Unified Health System.巴西生殖与孕产妇健康干预措施的覆盖范围与公平性:统一卫生系统实施后取得显著进展。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Nov 17;15(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0445-2.
9
Can Results-Based Financing improve health outcomes in resource poor settings? Evidence from Zimbabwe.基于结果的融资能否改善资源匮乏地区的健康状况?来自津巴布韦的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jun;279:113959. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113959. Epub 2021 May 7.
10
Addressing the huge poor-rich gap of inequalities in accessing safe childbirth care: A first step to achieving universal maternal health coverage in Tanzania.解决安全分娩护理获取方面巨大的贫富差距不平等问题:在坦桑尼亚实现全民孕产妇健康覆盖的第一步。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0246995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246995. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Urban-Rural Disparities in Non-Adherence to Iron Supplementation Among Pregnant Women Aged 15 to 49 in Sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲15至49岁孕妇中铁补充剂不依从性的城乡差异
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 19;22(6):964. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060964.
2
Assessing the joint effects of education, economic status, empowerment, and employment (4Es) disparities on the co-coverage of maternal, newborn and child health care services in sub-Saharan Africa: an application of the intersectionality approach.评估教育、经济状况、赋权和就业(4E)差距对撒哈拉以南非洲孕产妇、新生儿和儿童保健服务联合覆盖情况的影响:交叉性方法的应用
J Glob Health. 2025 May 9;15:04124. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04124.

本文引用的文献

1
Balancing the scales? Evaluating the impact of results-based financing on maternal health outcomes and related inequality of opportunity in Zimbabwe.平衡天平?评估基于结果的融资对津巴布韦母婴健康结果和相关机会不平等的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Oct;359:117257. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117257. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
2
The sorting effect in healthcare access: Those left behind.医疗保健获取中的排序效应:被落下的人。
Econ Hum Biol. 2023 Dec;51:101282. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101282. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
3
The impact of daylight on suicide rates.
日光对自杀率的影响。
Econ Hum Biol. 2022 Aug;46:101151. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2022.101151. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
4
Why did performance-based financing in Burkina Faso fail to achieve the intended equity effects? A process tracing study.为什么布基纳法索的基于绩效的融资未能实现预期的公平效果?一个过程追踪研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115065. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115065. Epub 2022 May 25.
5
Who is paid in pay-for-performance? Inequalities in the distribution of financial bonuses amongst health centres in Zimbabwe.谁在按绩效付费中获得报酬?津巴布韦卫生中心间金融奖金分配的不平等。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Apr 13;37(4):429-439. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab154.
6
'I was trying to get there, but I couldn't': social norms, vulnerability and lived experiences of home delivery in Mashonaland Central Province, Zimbabwe.“我曾试图去那里,但我没能做到”:津巴布韦马绍纳兰省的社会规范、脆弱性和家庭分娩的生活经历。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Oct 12;36(9):1441-1450. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab058.
7
Delivery channels and socioeconomic inequalities in coverage of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health interventions: analysis of 36 cross-sectional surveys in low-income and middle-income countries.生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施的提供渠道和社会经济不平等:对低收入和中等收入国家的 36 项横断面调查的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Aug;9(8):e1101-e1109. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00204-7. Epub 2021 May 26.
8
Can Results-Based Financing improve health outcomes in resource poor settings? Evidence from Zimbabwe.基于结果的融资能否改善资源匮乏地区的健康状况?来自津巴布韦的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jun;279:113959. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113959. Epub 2021 May 7.
9
Can Combining Performance-Based Financing With Equity Measures Result in Greater Equity in Utilization of Maternal Care Services? Evidence From Burkina Faso.绩效融资与公平措施相结合能否提高孕产妇保健服务的公平性?来自布基纳法索的证据。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Mar 1;11(3):308-322. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.121.
10
Evidence on result-based financing in maternal and child health in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.基于结果的融资在中低收入国家妇幼保健中的证据:系统评价。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2020 Jul 1;5:31. doi: 10.1186/s41256-020-00158-z. eCollection 2020.