Parker Daniel M, Tripura Rupam, Peto Thomas J, Maude Richard J, Nguon Chea, Chalk Jeremy, Sirithiranont Pasathorn, Imwong Mallika, von Seidlein Lorenz, White Nicholas J, Dondorp Arjen M
Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mae Sot, Thailand.
Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Heliyon. 2017 Nov 20;3(11):e00447. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00447. eCollection 2017 Nov.
The malaria burden is decreasing throughout the Greater Mekong Subregion, however transmission persists in some areas. Human movement, subclinical infections and complicated transmission patterns contribute to the persistence of malaria. This research describes the micro-geographical epidemiology of both clinical malaria and subclinical infections in three villages in Western Cambodia.
Three villages in Western Cambodia were selected for the study based on high reported incidence. A census was conducted at the beginning of the study, including demographic information and travel history. The total population was 1766. Cross-sectional surveys were conducted every three months from June 2013 to June 2014. infections were detected using an ultra-sensitive, high-volume, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (uPCR) technique. Clinical episodes were recorded by village health workers. The geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude) were collected for all houses and all participants were linked to their respective houses using a demographic surveillance system. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Most clinical episodes and subclinical infections occurred within a single study village. Clinical episodes clustered spatially in each village but only lasted for a month. In one study village subclinical infections clustered in geographic proximity to clusters of clinical episodes. The largest risk factor for clinical episodes was living in a house where another clinical episode occurred (model adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 6.9; CI: 2.3-19. 8). Subclinical infections of both and were associated with clinical episodes of the same species (AOR: 5.8; CI: 1.5-19.7 for and AOR: 14.6; CI: 8.6-25.2 for ) and self-reported overnight visits to forested areas (AOR = 3.8; CI: 1.8-7. 7 for and AOR = 2.9; CI: 1.7-4.8 for ).
Spatial clustering within the villages was transient, making the prediction of spatial clusters difficult. Interventions that are dependent on predicting spatial clusters (such as reactive case detection) would only have detected a small proportion of cases unless the entire village was screened within a limited time frame and with a highly sensitive diagnostic test. Subclinical infections may be acquired outside of the village (particularly in forested areas) and may play an important role in transmission.
在大湄公河次区域,疟疾负担正在减轻,但在一些地区仍存在传播。人口流动、亚临床感染和复杂的传播模式导致疟疾持续存在。本研究描述了柬埔寨西部三个村庄临床疟疾和亚临床感染的微观地理流行病学情况。
根据报告的高发病率,在柬埔寨西部选择了三个村庄进行研究。研究开始时进行了一次普查,包括人口统计信息和旅行史。总人口为1766人。从2013年6月至2014年6月,每三个月进行一次横断面调查。使用超灵敏、大容量定量聚合酶链反应(uPCR)技术检测感染情况。临床发病情况由乡村卫生工作者记录。收集了所有房屋的地理坐标(纬度和经度),并使用人口监测系统将所有参与者与其各自的房屋关联起来。获得了所有参与者的书面知情同意书。
大多数临床发病和亚临床感染发生在单个研究村庄内。每个村庄的临床发病在空间上聚集,但仅持续一个月。在一个研究村庄,亚临床感染在地理上聚集在临床发病聚集区附近。临床发病的最大风险因素是居住在另一个临床发病发生过的房屋中(模型调整比值比(AOR):6.9;可信区间:2.3 - 19.8)。间日疟和恶性疟的亚临床感染均与相同疟原虫种类的临床发病相关(间日疟的AOR:5.8;可信区间:1.5 - 19.7,恶性疟的AOR:14.6;可信区间:8.6 - 25.2),以及自我报告的到林区过夜访问(间日疟的AOR = 3.8;可信区间:1.8 - 7.7,恶性疟的AOR = 2.9;可信区间:1.7 - 4.8)。
村庄内的空间聚集是短暂的,使得预测空间聚集区变得困难。依赖于预测空间聚集区的干预措施(如反应性病例检测),除非在有限的时间框架内对整个村庄进行筛查并使用高度灵敏的诊断测试,否则只能检测到一小部分病例。亚临床感染可能在村庄外(特别是在林区)获得,并且可能在传播中起重要作用。