Greenwood Eleni A, Cedars Marcelle I, Santoro Nanette, Eisenberg Esther, Kao Chia-Ning, Haisenleder Daniel J, Diamond Michael P, Huddleston Heather G
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Fertil Steril. 2017 Dec;108(6):1070-1077. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.015.
To test the hypothesis that women with unexplained infertility demonstrate evidence of diminished ovarian reserve when compared with a population of community controls.
Cross-sectional study.
Multicenter university-based clinical practices.
PATIENT(S): Study participants included 277 healthy, normo-ovulatory female partners with rigorously defined unexplained infertility randomly selected from a multicenter trial (Assessment of Multiple Intrauterine Gestations from Ovarian Stimulation). Controls included 226 healthy, normo-ovulatory women not seeking treatment for fertility from a community-based cohort (Ovarian Aging study).
INTERVENTION(S): Serum antimüllerian hormone (AMH) assay at a central laboratory, FSH, fasting serum metabolic testing, transvaginal ultrasonography for antral follicle counts (AFCs), anthropometric measurements.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Average AMH, AFC, and AMH/AFC were compared between infertile and control women by age. Analyses of covariance compared these outcomes while controlling for confounders, including age, race, body mass index, smoking history, and study site.
RESULT(S): In our models, AMH, AFC, and AMH/AFC ovarian reserve indices did not differ between infertile women and community-based controls, after controlling for age, race, body mass index, smoking history, and study site.
CONCLUSION(S): Currently utilized predictors of ovarian reserve do not discriminate women with rigorously defined unexplained infertility from healthy community-based women of similar demographic characteristics. Contrary to our hypothesis, among women with FSH in the normal range (≤12 IU/L), women with unexplained infertility did not show evidence of decreased ovarian reserve as measured by AMH and AFC. Ovarian reserve markers in isolation may not serve as predictors of future fertility.
检验以下假设,即与社区对照人群相比,不明原因不孕症女性存在卵巢储备功能下降的证据。
横断面研究。
多中心大学附属医院临床机构。
研究参与者包括从一项多中心试验(卵巢刺激后多胎宫内妊娠评估)中随机选取的277名健康、排卵正常且患有严格定义的不明原因不孕症的女性伴侣。对照组包括226名来自社区队列研究(卵巢衰老研究)的健康、排卵正常且未寻求生育治疗的女性。
在中心实验室进行血清抗苗勒管激素(AMH)检测、促卵泡生成素(FSH)检测、空腹血清代谢检测、经阴道超声检查窦卵泡计数(AFC)以及人体测量。
按年龄比较不孕女性和对照女性的平均AMH、AFC以及AMH/AFC。协方差分析在控制包括年龄、种族、体重指数、吸烟史和研究地点等混杂因素的同时比较这些指标。
在我们的模型中,在控制年龄、种族、体重指数、吸烟史和研究地点后,不孕女性和社区对照人群之间的AMH、AFC以及AMH/AFC卵巢储备指标并无差异。
目前所采用的卵巢储备功能预测指标无法区分患有严格定义的不明原因不孕症的女性与具有相似人口统计学特征的健康社区女性。与我们的假设相反,在促卵泡生成素(FSH)处于正常范围(≤12 IU/L)的女性中,不明原因不孕症女性并未表现出AMH和AFC所测量的卵巢储备功能下降的证据。单独的卵巢储备标志物可能无法作为未来生育能力的预测指标。