• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动驾驶中车头时距的车队分析。

Fleet analysis of headway distance for autonomous driving.

机构信息

Department of Automotive Engineering, Clemson University, Greenville 29607, SC, USA.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:145-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.009
PMID:29203012
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Modern automobiles are going through a paradigm shift, where the driver may no longer be needed to drive the vehicle. As the self-driving vehicles are making their way to public roads the automakers have to ensure the naturalistic driving feel to gain drivers' confidence and accelerate adoption rates.

METHOD

This paper filters and analyzes a subset of radar data collected from SHRP2 with focus on characterizing the naturalistic headway distance with respect to the vehicle speed.

RESULTS

The paper identifies naturalistic headway distance and compares it with the previous findings from the literature.

CONCLUSION

A clear relation between time headway and speed was confirmed and quantified. A significant difference exists among individual drivers which supports a need to further refine the analysis.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

By understanding the relationship between human driving and their surroundings, the naturalistic driving behavior can be quantified and used to increase the adoption rates of autonomous driving. Dangerous and safety-compromising driving can be identified as well in order to avoid its replication in the control algorithms.

摘要

引言

现代汽车正在经历一场范式转变,在这种转变中,驾驶员可能不再需要驾驶车辆。随着自动驾驶汽车驶上公共道路,汽车制造商必须确保自然的驾驶感觉,以获得驾驶员的信心并加速采用率。

方法

本文从 SHRP2 中筛选和分析了一部分雷达数据,重点是根据车辆速度对自然的车头时距进行特征描述。

结果

本文确定了自然的车头时距,并将其与文献中的先前发现进行了比较。

结论

确认并量化了时间车头时距和速度之间的明显关系。个体驾驶员之间存在显著差异,这支持了进一步细化分析的必要性。

实际应用

通过了解人类驾驶及其周围环境之间的关系,可以量化自然驾驶行为,并提高自动驾驶的采用率。为了避免在控制算法中复制危险和危及安全的驾驶行为,也可以识别这种行为。

相似文献

1
Fleet analysis of headway distance for autonomous driving.自动驾驶中车头时距的车队分析。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:145-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
2
Effects of peripheral transverse line markings on drivers' speed and headway choice and crash risk in car-following: A naturalistic observation study.跟驰中周边横向标线对驾驶员速度和车头时距选择及碰撞风险的影响:一项自然观察研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Oct;146:105701. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105701. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
3
Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.比一般人类驾驶员更安全(而人类驾驶员不如我安全)?考察自动驾驶汽车的一项流行安全基准。
J Safety Res. 2019 Jun;69:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
4
Driver behavior analysis for right-turn drivers at signalized intersections using SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study data.基于 SHRP 2 自然驾驶研究数据的信号交叉口右转驾驶员行为分析。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:177-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
5
Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study.驾驶环境会影响驾驶员参与视觉手动电话任务的决策:来自自然驾驶研究的证据。
J Safety Res. 2015 Jun;53:87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.03.010. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
6
Long-term effectiveness of reverse linear perspective markings on crash mitigation in car-following: Evidence from naturalistic observations.跟驰过程中反向线性视错觉标记对降低碰撞风险的长期有效性:自然观察证据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106273. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106273. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
7
Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.来自100辆汽车自然驾驶研究的超车操作过程中的驾驶员行为。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S176-81. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1057281.
8
Rage against the machine? Google's self-driving cars versus human drivers.对机器发怒?谷歌的自动驾驶汽车与人类驾驶员
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
9
Exploring causes and effects of automated vehicle disengagement using statistical modeling and classification tree based on field test data.利用基于现场测试数据的统计建模和分类树技术探究自动驾驶汽车脱离的原因和影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.015. Epub 2019 May 16.
10
Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.利用自然驾驶数据对驾驶员在十字路口使用手机行为的研究。
J Safety Res. 2015 Sep;54:89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Associating Vehicles Automation With Drivers Functional State Assessment Systems: A Challenge for Road Safety in the Future.将车辆自动化与驾驶员功能状态评估系统相结合:未来道路安全面临的一项挑战。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Apr 24;13:131. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00131. eCollection 2019.