Suppr超能文献

圆窗与耳蜗造口术手术入路对耳蜗内阶间偏移的影响:平板计算机断层扫描研究的初步结果。

The impact of round window vs cochleostomy surgical approaches on interscalar excursions in the cochlea: Preliminary results from a flat-panel computed tomography study.

作者信息

Jiam Nicole T, Limb Charles J

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Nov 24;2(3):142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2016.07.001. eCollection 2016 Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate incidence of interscalar excursions between round window (RW) and cochleostomy approaches for cochlear implant (CI) insertion.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-comparison. Flat-panel CT (FPCT) scans for 8 CI users with Med-El standard length electrode arrays were collected. Surgical technique was identified by a combination of operative notes and FPCT imaging. Four cochleae underwent round window insertion and 4 cochleae underwent cochleostomy approaches anterior and inferior to the round window.

RESULTS

In our pilot study, cochleostomy approaches were associated with a higher likelihood of interscalar excursion. Within the cochleostomy group, we found 29% of electrode contacts (14 of 48 electrodes) to be outside the scala tympani. On the other hand, 8.5% of the electrode contacts (4 of 47 electrodes) in the round window insertion group were extra-scalar to the scala tympani. These displacements occurred at a mean angle of occurrence of 364° ± 133°, near the apex of the cochlea. Round window electrode displacements tend to localize at angle of occurrences of 400° or greater. Cochleostomy electrodes occurred at an angle of occurrence of 19°-490°.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, the optimal surgical approach for standard CI electrode insertion is highly debated, to a certain extent due to a lack of post-operative assessment of intracochlear electrode contact. Based on our preliminary findings, cochleostomy approach is associated with an increased likelihood of interscalar excursions, and these findings should be further evaluated with future prospective studies.

摘要

目的

评估在人工耳蜗(CI)植入术中,圆窗(RW)入路与耳蜗造瘘入路之间跨蜗管偏移的发生率。

方法

这是一项回顾性病例对照研究。收集了8例使用美敦力标准长度电极阵列的CI使用者的平板CT(FPCT)扫描图像。通过手术记录和FPCT成像相结合的方式确定手术技术。4个耳蜗采用圆窗入路,4个耳蜗采用圆窗前下方的耳蜗造瘘入路。

结果

在我们的初步研究中,耳蜗造瘘入路与跨蜗管偏移的可能性更高相关。在耳蜗造瘘组中,我们发现29%的电极触点(48个电极中的14个)位于鼓阶之外。另一方面,圆窗入路组中8.5%的电极触点(47个电极中的4个)在鼓阶之外跨蜗管。这些移位发生在耳蜗顶部附近,平均发生角度为364°±133°。圆窗电极移位倾向于定位在400°或更大的发生角度。耳蜗造瘘电极的发生角度为19°-490°。

结论

目前,标准CI电极植入的最佳手术入路存在高度争议,在一定程度上是由于缺乏对耳蜗内电极触点的术后评估。基于我们的初步研究结果,耳蜗造瘘入路与跨蜗管偏移的可能性增加相关,这些结果应在未来的前瞻性研究中进一步评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b0f/5698540/3fc6069d75a6/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验