Suzuki Masanori, Matsue Yuya, Izumi Sayaka, Kimura Ayako, Hashimoto Tomoaki, Otomo Kentaro, Saito Hiroshi, Suzuki Makoto, Kato Yasuhisa, Funakoshi Ryohkan
Department of Pharmacy, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Kameda Medical Center, 929, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan.
Heart Vessels. 2018 Jun;33(6):615-622. doi: 10.1007/s00380-017-1099-8. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
We evaluated the impact of pharmacist-led heart failure (HF) drug recommendations during hospitalization for hospitalized patients with HF. Hospitalized patients with HF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were hospitalized before (n = 208, non-intervention group) or after (n = 170, intervention group) the launch of the HF multidisciplinary team (HFMDT) approach with pharmacist-led HF medication optimization. There were no significant group differences in patient background characteristics at admission. Patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction who were not on beta blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACE-I/ARB) at admission were significantly more likely to be on beta blockers at the time of discharge in the intervention group (73.3 vs 96.3%, P = 0.027) compared to those in non-intervention group; however, the change in ACE-I/ARB prescriptions was not significant (53.3 vs 63.3%, P = 0.601). The proportion of patients on any drug with recommendations against its use in patients with HF did not change from admission to discharge in the non-intervention group (21.2 vs. 20.2%, P = 0.855), but was significantly reduced in the intervention group (22.9 vs. 12.9%, P = 0.005). There were no group differences in the in-hospital all-cause mortality (non-intervention, 3.4%; intervention, 2.4%; P = 0.761) or length of hospital stay (median: non-intervention, 13 days; intervention, 14 days; P = 0.508). Pharmacist-led HF drug recommendations during hospitalization as part of a HFMDT approach for hospitalized patients with HF can increase beta blocker prescriptions and decrease non-preferred drug prescriptions.
我们评估了药师主导的心力衰竭(HF)药物推荐对因HF住院患者的影响。对因HF住院的患者进行了回顾性研究。患者在HF多学科团队(HFMDT)方法(包括药师主导的HF药物优化)启动之前(n = 208,非干预组)或之后(n = 170,干预组)住院。入院时患者背景特征在两组间无显著差异。与非干预组相比,入院时未使用β受体阻滞剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ACE-I/ARB)的射血分数降低的HF患者在干预组出院时使用β受体阻滞剂的可能性显著更高(73.3%对96.3%,P = 0.027);然而,ACE-I/ARB处方的变化不显著(53.3%对63.3%,P = 0.601)。非干预组中使用任何被推荐不应用于HF患者的药物的患者比例从入院到出院没有变化(21.2%对20.2%,P = 0.855),但在干预组中显著降低(22.9%对12.9%,P = 0.005)。两组间住院全因死亡率(非干预组为3.4%;干预组为2.4%;P = 0.761)或住院时间(中位数:非干预组为13天;干预组为14天;P = 0.508)无差异。作为针对因HF住院患者HFMDT方法的一部分,药师在住院期间主导的HF药物推荐可增加β受体阻滞剂处方并减少非首选药物处方。