Department of Counseling, Developmental, and Educational Psychology, Boston College, Campion Hall 307, 140 Commonwealth Ave, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 May;48(4):1087-1097. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1082-6. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
Sexual minority adolescent sexual risk behavior studies often overlook young women, do not consider behavior- and identity-based sexual orientation indicators in combination, and focus mainly on condomless sex. We examined multiple risk behaviors in a large sample of adolescent young men and women using combined behavior- and identity-based indices. The 2015 Dane County Youth Assessment data included 4734 students in 22 high schools who had ever voluntarily engaged in sexual contact (51.7% male; 76.0% White, non-Hispanic). Items assessed having sex with unfamiliar partners, sex while using substances, using protection, and STI testing. Logistic regressions tested for disparities based on combined identity- and behavior-based sexual orientation indicators. For both young men and women, youth who reported heterosexual or questioning identities-but who had sex with same-sex partners-were at consistently greater risk than heterosexual youth with only different-sex partners. Also, for both young men and women, bisexuals with partners of both sexes more consistently reported higher risk than heterosexual youth than did bisexuals with only different-sex partners. Risk behavior for gay young men who had sex only with men mirrored those in extant literature. Risk levels differed for specific groups of sexual minority young women, thus deserving further attention. Findings underscore the need for sexual health research to consider sexual orientation in a more multidimensional manner.
性少数青少年的性行为风险行为研究往往忽略了年轻女性,没有结合行为和身份为基础的性取向指标,并且主要关注无保护性行为。我们使用基于行为和身份的综合指标,对大量青少年男女的多种风险行为进行了研究。2015 年 Dane 县青年评估数据包括 22 所高中的 4734 名曾自愿发生过性行为的学生(51.7%为男性;76.0%为白人,非西班牙裔)。项目评估了与陌生伴侣发生性行为、性行为时使用药物、使用保护措施和性传播感染检测情况。逻辑回归测试了基于综合身份和行为为基础的性取向指标的差异。对于男性和女性青少年来说,报告异性恋或疑问身份但与同性伴侣发生性行为的青少年,比只有异性伴侣的异性恋青少年风险更高。此外,对于男性和女性青少年来说,与两种性别的伴侣发生性关系的双性恋者比只有异性伴侣的双性恋者更频繁地报告更高的风险。只与男性发生性关系的男同性恋青少年的风险行为与现有文献中的一致。特定群体的性少数青少年女性的风险水平不同,因此值得进一步关注。研究结果强调了性健康研究需要以更多维的方式考虑性取向。