Ogawa Tadayuki, Hirokawa Nobutaka
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Center of Excellence in Genome Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Biophys Rev. 2018 Apr;10(2):299-306. doi: 10.1007/s12551-017-0354-7. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
The need for accurate description of protein behavior in solution has gained importance in various fields, including biophysics, biochemistry, structural biology, drug discovery, and antibody drugs. To achieve the desired accuracy, multiple precise analyses should be performed on the target molecule, compared, and effectively combined. This review focuses on the combination of multiple analyses in solution: size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), multi-angle light scattering (MALS), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC), and their complementary methods, such as atomic force microscopy (AFM) and mass spectrometry (MS). We also discuss the comparison between the determined molar mass value of not only the standard proteins, but of a target molecule tubulin and its depolymerizing protein, KIF2, as an example. The comparison of the estimated molar mass value from the different methods provides additional information about the target molecule, because the value reflects the dynamically changing states of the target molecule in solution. The combination and integration of multiple methods will permit a deeper understanding of protein dynamics in solution.
在包括生物物理学、生物化学、结构生物学、药物发现和抗体药物等各个领域,准确描述蛋白质在溶液中的行为变得愈发重要。为达到所需的准确性,应对目标分子进行多种精确分析、比较并有效整合。本综述聚焦于溶液中多种分析方法的结合:尺寸排阻色谱法(SEC)、多角度光散射法(MALS)、小角X射线散射法(SAXS)、分析型超速离心法(AUC)及其互补方法,如原子力显微镜(AFM)和质谱(MS)。我们还以标准蛋白以及目标分子微管蛋白及其解聚蛋白KIF2为例,讨论了所测定的摩尔质量值之间的比较。不同方法估算的摩尔质量值的比较为目标分子提供了额外信息,因为该值反映了目标分子在溶液中的动态变化状态。多种方法的结合与整合将有助于更深入地理解蛋白质在溶液中的动力学。