Jameson Meredith, Fehringer Karen, Neu Madalynn
University of Colorado, College of Nursing, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado, School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA.
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2018 Jan;23(1). doi: 10.1111/jspn.12203. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
The aim of this study was to compare the Mother-Infant/Toddler Feeding Scale (MITFS) and the Nursing Child Assessment Feeding Scale (NCAFS). Specific questions were as follows: (1) Are there differences between the results of the MITFS and the NCAFS tools in terms of rating infant feeding interactions? And (2) does one tool provide a more detailed, nuanced overview of the quality of feeding interactions than the other?
This comparative descriptive study is a secondary analysis of a study evaluating a massage intervention for infants with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A feeding observation for each dyad was scored using both the NCAFS and MITFS. Infants were 6-18 weeks of age.
There were moderate correlations (r = 0.3-0.8) between 11 of 20 possible NCAFS and MITFS mother-related subscales, and between 3 of 10 possible NCAFS and the MITFS infant-related subscales. A total of 19 dyads (83%) had one or more NCAFS subscale scores that were at least 1 standard deviation (SD) below normative scores, and 21 dyads (91%) had one or more MITFS subscale T-scores that deviated 1 SD from the normative T-scores. Agreement between the two instruments on scores deviating from the norm was 78%.
Both instruments discussed in this paper are standardized ways of assessing an infant feeding. Use of a standardized feeding tool is an objective way to evaluate feedings and can potentially identify specific areas of concern to guide an individualized intervention for a mother-infant dyad. Thus, nurses and other health professionals working with mothers and babies, whether in the hospital, pediatrician offices, or clinics would benefit from learning how to use a standardized feeding tool. Use of a feeding tool also provides the opportunity for nurses to understand the basis of important qualities of a feeding interaction, and a way for nurses who regularly feed infants to self-evaluate their feeding methods. This may minimize less than optimal interactions and allow for optimal support for infants during feedings by mothers and nurses.
本研究旨在比较母婴/幼儿喂养量表(MITFS)和儿童护理评估喂养量表(NCAFS)。具体问题如下:(1)在对婴儿喂养互动进行评分方面,MITFS和NCAFS工具的结果是否存在差异?以及(2)与另一种工具相比,一种工具是否能提供更详细、更细微的喂养互动质量概述?
这项比较描述性研究是对一项评估针对患有胃食管反流病(GERD)症状婴儿的按摩干预研究的二次分析。使用NCAFS和MITFS对每个二元组的喂养观察进行评分。婴儿年龄为6至18周。
在20个可能的NCAFS与MITFS母亲相关子量表中的11个之间,以及在10个可能的NCAFS与MITFS婴儿相关子量表中的3个之间,存在中等程度的相关性(r = 0.3 - 0.8)。共有19个二元组(83%)的一个或多个NCAFS子量表得分至少比标准得分低1个标准差(SD),21个二元组(91%)的一个或多个MITFS子量表T得分与标准T得分相差1个SD。两种工具在偏离标准得分方面的一致性为78%。
本文讨论的两种工具都是评估婴儿喂养的标准化方法。使用标准化喂养工具是评估喂养的一种客观方式,并且有可能识别出特定的关注领域,以指导针对母婴二元组的个性化干预。因此,无论是在医院、儿科医生办公室还是诊所,与母亲和婴儿打交道的护士和其他健康专业人员都将从学习如何使用标准化喂养工具中受益。使用喂养工具还为护士提供了理解喂养互动重要品质基础的机会,以及为经常喂养婴儿的护士提供了自我评估其喂养方法的途径。这可能会减少不太理想的互动,并使母亲和护士在喂养期间为婴儿提供最佳支持。