Forcada-Guex Margarita, Pierrehumbert Blaise, Borghini Ayala, Moessinger Adrien, Muller-Nix Carole
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):e107-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1145.
With the increased survival of very preterm infants, there is a growing concern for their developmental and socioemotional outcomes. The quality of the early mother-infant relationship has been noted as 1 of the factors that may exacerbate or soften the potentially adverse impact of preterm birth, particularly concerning the infant's later competencies and development. The first purpose of the study was to identify at 6 months of corrected age whether there were specific dyadic mother-infant patterns of interaction in preterm as compared with term mother-infant dyads. The second purpose was to examine the potential impact of these dyadic patterns on the infant's behavioral and developmental outcomes at 18 months of corrected age.
During a 12-month period (January-December 1998), all preterm infants who were <34 weeks of gestational age and hospitalized at the NICU of the Lausanne University Hospital were considered for inclusion in this longitudinal prospective follow-up study. Control healthy term infants were recruited during the same period from the maternity ward of our hospital. Mother-infant dyads with preterm infants (n = 47) and term infants (n = 25) were assessed at 6 months of corrected age during a mother-infant play interaction and coded according to the Care Index. This instrument evaluates the mother's interactional behavior according to 3 scales (sensitivity, control, and unresponsiveness) and the child's interactional behavior according to 4 scales (cooperation, compliance, difficult, and passivity). At 18 months, behavioral outcomes of the children were assessed on the basis of a semistructured interview of the mother, the Symptom Check List. The Symptom Check List explores 4 groups of behavioral symptoms: sleeping problems, eating problems, psychosomatic symptoms, and behavioral and emotional disorders. At the same age, developmental outcomes were evaluated using the Griffiths Developmental Scales. Five areas were evaluated: locomotor, personal-social, hearing and speech, eye-hand coordination, and performance.
Among the possible dyadic patterns of interaction, 2 patterns emerge recurrently in mother-infant preterm dyads: a "cooperative pattern" with a sensitive mother and a cooperative-responsive infant (28%) and a "controlling pattern" with a controlling mother and a compulsive-compliant infant (28%). The remaining 44% form a heterogeneous group that gathers all of the other preterm dyads and is composed of 1 sensitive mother-passive infant; 10 controlling mothers with a cooperative, difficult, or passive infant; and 10 unresponsive mothers with a cooperative, difficult, or passive infant. Among the term control subjects, 68% of the dyads are categorized as cooperative pattern dyads, 12% as controlling pattern dyads, and the 20% remaining as heterogeneous dyads. At 18 months, preterm infants of cooperative pattern dyads have similar outcomes as the term control infants. Preterm infants of controlling pattern dyads have significantly fewer positive outcomes as compared with preterm infants of cooperative pattern dyads, as well as compared with term control infants. They display significantly more behavioral symptoms than term infants, including more eating problems than term infants as well as infants from cooperative preterm dyads. Infants of the controlling preterm dyads do not differ significantly for the total development quotient but have worse personal-social development than term infants and worse hearing-speech development than infants from cooperative preterm dyads. The preterm infants of the heterogeneous group have outcomes that can be considered as intermediate with no significant differences compared with preterm infants from the cooperative pattern or the controlling pattern dyads.
Among mother-preterm infant dyads, we identified 2 specific patterns of interaction that could play either a protective (cooperative pattern) or a risk-precipitating (controlling pattern) role on developmental and behavioral outcome, independent of perinatal risk factors and of the family's socioeconomic background. The controlling pattern is much more prevalent among preterm than term dyads and is related to a less favorable infant outcome. However, the cooperative pattern still represents almost 30% of the preterm dyads, with infants' outcome comparable to the ones of term infants. These results point out the impact of the quality of mother-infant relationship on the infant's outcome. The most important clinical implication should be to support a healthy parent-infant relationship already in the NICU but also in the first months of the infant's life. Early individualized family-based interventions during neonatal hospitalization and transition to home have been shown to reduce maternal stress and depression and increase maternal self-esteem and to improve positive early parent-preterm infant interactions.
随着极早产儿存活率的提高,人们越来越关注他们的发育和社会情感结局。早期母婴关系的质量被认为是可能加剧或减轻早产潜在不利影响的因素之一,尤其是在婴儿后期能力和发育方面。本研究的首要目的是确定在矫正年龄6个月时,与足月儿母婴二元组相比,早产儿母婴之间是否存在特定的二元互动模式。第二个目的是研究这些二元模式对矫正年龄18个月时婴儿行为和发育结局的潜在影响。
在12个月期间(1998年1月至12月),所有孕周小于34周且在洛桑大学医院新生儿重症监护病房住院的早产儿均被纳入本纵向前瞻性随访研究。同期从我院产科病房招募健康足月儿作为对照。对47对早产儿母婴二元组和25对足月儿母婴二元组在矫正年龄6个月时进行母婴互动游戏评估,并根据关爱指数进行编码。该工具根据3个量表(敏感性、控制性和无反应性)评估母亲的互动行为,根据4个量表(合作性、顺从性、困难性和被动性)评估儿童的互动行为。在18个月时,根据对母亲的半结构化访谈、症状检查表评估儿童的行为结局。症状检查表探讨4组行为症状:睡眠问题、饮食问题、身心症状以及行为和情绪障碍。在同一年龄,使用格里菲斯发育量表评估发育结局。评估五个领域:运动、个人社交、听力和语言、眼手协调以及操作。
在可能的二元互动模式中,2种模式在早产儿母婴二元组中反复出现:一种是“合作模式”,母亲敏感且婴儿合作反应性强(28%);另一种是“控制模式”,母亲控制性强且婴儿强迫顺从(28%)。其余44%形成一个异质组,包括所有其他早产儿二元组,由1对敏感母亲 - 被动婴儿;10对控制性母亲与合作性、困难性或被动性婴儿;以及10对无反应性母亲与合作性、困难性或被动性婴儿组成。在足月儿对照受试者中,68%的二元组被归类为合作模式二元组,12%为控制模式二元组,其余20%为异质二元组。在18个月时,合作模式二元组的早产儿结局与足月儿对照婴儿相似。与合作模式二元组的早产儿相比,以及与足月儿对照婴儿相比,控制模式二元组的早产儿积极结局明显更少。他们表现出的行为症状明显多于足月儿,包括饮食问题比足月儿以及合作性早产儿二元组的婴儿更多。控制模式早产儿二元组的婴儿在总发育商方面无显著差异,但个人社交发育比足月儿差,听力和语言发育比合作模式早产儿二元组的婴儿差。异质组的早产儿结局可被视为中等水平,与合作模式或控制模式二元组的早产儿相比无显著差异。
在早产儿母婴二元组中,我们确定了2种特定的互动模式,它们可能对发育和行为结局起到保护(合作模式)或风险促发(控制模式)作用,独立于围产期风险因素和家庭社会经济背景。控制模式在早产儿二元组中比足月儿二元组更为普遍,且与婴儿较差结局相关。然而,合作模式仍占早产儿二元组近30%,其婴儿结局与足月儿相当。这些结果指出了母婴关系质量对婴儿结局的影响。最重要的临床意义应该是在新生儿重症监护病房以及婴儿生命的最初几个月就支持建立健康的亲子关系。新生儿住院期间及过渡到家庭阶段早期基于家庭的个体化干预已被证明可减轻母亲的压力和抑郁,提高母亲的自尊,并改善早期积极的亲子互动。