Shepperd James A, Pogge Gabrielle, Losee Joy E, Lipsey Nikolette P, Redford Liz
a University of Florida.
J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(5):615-624. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2017.1412932. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
All people share a need for safety. Yet people's pursuit of safety can conflict when it comes to guns, with some people perceiving guns as a means to safety and others perceiving guns as a threat to safety. We examined this conflict on a U.S. college campus that prohibits guns. We distinguished between people (N = 11,390) who (1) own a gun for protection, (2) own a gun exclusively for reasons other than protection (e.g., collecting, sports), and (3) do not own a gun. Protection owners felt less safe on campus and supported allowing guns on campus. They also reported that they and others would feel safer and that gun violence would decrease if they carried a gun on campus. Non-owners and non-protection owners felt the reverse. The findings suggest that protection concerns, rather than gun-ownership per se, account for diverging perceptions and attitudes about guns and gun control.
所有人都有对安全的需求。然而,在枪支问题上,人们对安全的追求可能会产生冲突,有些人将枪支视为保障安全的手段,而另一些人则将枪支视为对安全的威胁。我们在美国一所禁止枪支的大学校园里研究了这种冲突。我们区分了三类人(N = 11390):(1)为保护自己而拥有枪支的人,(2)纯粹出于保护以外的原因(如收藏、运动)而拥有枪支的人,以及(3)不拥有枪支的人。出于保护目的而拥有枪支的人在校园里感觉更不安全,并且支持在校园里允许携带枪支。他们还表示,如果他们在校园里携带枪支,他们自己和其他人会感觉更安全,而且枪支暴力会减少。不拥有枪支的人和非出于保护目的而拥有枪支的人则持相反观点。研究结果表明,对保护的担忧,而非枪支所有权本身,导致了人们对枪支及枪支管制的不同看法和态度。