Suppr超能文献

鼻塞式无创正压通气时面罩漏气流:一项随机交叉试验。

Face mask leak with nasal cannula during noninvasive positive pressure ventilation: A randomized crossover trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States.

Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, Fort Sam Houston, TX, United States.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;36(6):942-948. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.10.055. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nasal cannula can achieve apneic oxygenation during emergency intubation. However, pre-procedure nasal cannula placement may be difficult in patients undergoing non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) prior to intubation. Our objective was to compare mask leak during NPPV with versus without simultaneous application of nasal cannula. We hypothesized mask leak would be no worse with concomitant use of nasal cannula (non-inferiority design).

METHODS

We performed a randomized crossover non-inferiority study of healthy volunteers. We randomized subjects undergoing 60s trials of NPPV (10cmHO continuous positive airway pressure) to either NPPV alone (NPPV-a) or NPPV with nasal cannula at 15L/min (NPPV-nc). After a brief rest period, all subjects underwent the alternative intervention. The primary outcome was time averaged mask leak over 60s (L/min). We defined a non-inferiority margin of 5L/min.

RESULTS

We enrolled 64 subjects. Mean time-averaged mask leak was 2.2L/min for NPPV-a versus 4.0L/min for NPPV-nc for a difference of 1.7L/min (one-sided 95% CI -∞ to 3.2L/min). NPPV-a resulted in higher mean minute volume received (13.5 versus 12.2L) and higher mean respiratory rates (14.8 versus 13.5 breaths per minute).

CONCLUSION

The addition of nasal cannula during NPPV does not significantly increase mask leak. The simultaneous application of nasal cannula with NPPV may be a useful strategy to streamline airway management among patients undergoing NPPV prior to intubation.

摘要

背景

鼻导管在紧急插管期间可以实现窒息性氧合。然而,在插管前接受无创正压通气(NPPV)的患者可能难以在术前放置鼻导管。我们的目的是比较 NPPV 时同时使用鼻导管与不使用鼻导管时的面罩泄漏情况。我们假设同时使用鼻导管不会导致面罩泄漏更严重(非劣效性设计)。

方法

我们对健康志愿者进行了一项随机交叉非劣效性研究。我们将接受 60 秒 NPPV(10cmHO 持续气道正压通气)试验的受试者随机分为仅接受 NPPV(NPPV-a)或 15L/min 鼻导管(NPPV-nc)的 NPPV 组。短暂休息后,所有受试者接受了替代干预。主要结局是 60 秒内平均面罩泄漏量(L/min)。我们定义非劣效性边界为 5L/min。

结果

我们共纳入 64 名受试者。NPPV-a 的平均面罩泄漏量为 2.2L/min,NPPV-nc 的平均面罩泄漏量为 4.0L/min,差异为 1.7L/min(单侧 95%CI-∞至 3.2L/min)。NPPV-a 导致更高的平均分钟通气量(13.5 与 12.2L)和更高的平均呼吸频率(14.8 与 13.5 次/分钟)。

结论

在 NPPV 中添加鼻导管不会显著增加面罩泄漏。在插管前接受 NPPV 的患者中,同时应用鼻导管和 NPPV 可能是一种简化气道管理的有用策略。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验