CHRU Brest, Service d'anatomie et cytologie pathologiques, Brest, F-29220, France.
CHRU Brest, Service de chirurgie viscérale, Brest, F-29220, France.
Hum Pathol. 2018 Feb;72:135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
Mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancers (CRCs) are good responders to anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy, but the value of PD-L1 testing remains unclear. We studied PD-L1 expression and the tumor immune microenvironment in dMMR CRC as a model of good responders to immunotherapy. We examined 35 dMMR and 34 mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) CRCs using immune cell markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, and FOXP3) as well as programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry staining in whole tumor specimens and tissue microarray slides to compare 4 PD-L1 immunohistochemistry clones (SP142, E1L3N, 22C3, and 28.8). We observed no significant difference in PD-L1 expression between dMMR and pMMR CRCs. Only 2 dMMR tumors had membranous PD-L1 staining. Expression of PD-L1 was greater in stromal immune cells of dMMR CRC, which also contained more numerous intraepithelial (CD3, CD8+, FOXP3, and PD-1) and stromal (CD8, PD-1) lymphocytes than did pMMR tumors. Immune cell quantification discriminated better between dMMR and pMMR tumors than did PD-L1 expression. Tumor heterogeneity and variations in PD-L1 expression were noted with different antibodies, especially for PD-L1 immune cells, which were more numerous at the invasion margin. Given the poor correlation with mismatch repair status and technical limitations, the value of PD-L1 testing to accompany the development of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy remains unclear. Further clinical trials are required to determine which parameters are valuable predictive biomarkers of the response to immunotherapy among mismatch repair status, PD-L1 expression, and immune cell quantification in CRC.
错配修复缺陷(dMMR)结直肠癌(CRC)对抗程序性细胞死亡配体-1(PD-L1)免疫治疗反应良好,但 PD-L1 检测的价值仍不清楚。我们以免疫治疗的良好反应者为模型,研究了 dMMR CRC 中的 PD-L1 表达和肿瘤免疫微环境。我们使用免疫细胞标志物(CD3、CD4、CD8、CD20、CD68 和 FOXP3)以及程序性细胞死亡受体-1(PD-1)和 PD-L1 免疫组化染色,在全肿瘤标本和组织微阵列切片中检查了 35 例 dMMR 和 34 例错配修复有效的(pMMR)CRC,以比较 4 种 PD-L1 免疫组化克隆(SP142、E1L3N、22C3 和 28.8)。我们观察到 dMMR 和 pMMR CRC 之间 PD-L1 表达无显著差异。仅有 2 例 dMMR 肿瘤有膜 PD-L1 染色。dMMR CRC 中基质免疫细胞的 PD-L1 表达更高,与 pMMR 肿瘤相比,其上皮内(CD3、CD8+、FOXP3 和 PD-1)和基质(CD8、PD-1)淋巴细胞也更多。与 PD-L1 表达相比,免疫细胞定量能更好地区分 dMMR 和 pMMR 肿瘤。不同抗体观察到肿瘤异质性和 PD-L1 表达变化,尤其是 PD-L1 免疫细胞,在侵袭边缘更多。鉴于与错配修复状态的相关性差和技术限制,PD-L1 检测伴随抗 PD-1/PD-L1 免疫治疗的发展的价值仍不清楚。需要进一步的临床试验来确定在 CRC 中,错配修复状态、PD-L1 表达和免疫细胞定量中,哪些参数是免疫治疗反应的有价值的预测生物标志物。