• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理多样性:多患者环境中医生认知的概念化。

Managing Multiplicity: Conceptualizing Physician Cognition in Multipatient Environments.

机构信息

T.M. Chan is assistant professor, Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, program director, Clinician Educator Area of Focused Competence program, and adjunct scientist, McMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory (MERIT), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; ORCID: 0000-0001-6104-462X. M. Mercuri is assistant professor, Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. K. Van Dewark is clinical instructor, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. J. Sherbino is associate professor, Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, and assistant dean of education research, and director, McMaster Education Research, Innovation, and Theory (MERIT), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. A. Schwartz is Michael Reese Endowed Professor of Medical Education, associate head, Department of Medical Education, and research professor, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago; ORCID: 0000-0003-3809-6637. G. Norman is professor emeritus, Department of Clinical Epidemiology Biostatistics, and founding member, Program for Education Research and Development, and scientist, McMaster Education Research, Innovation and Theory (MERIT), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. M. Lineberry is director, Simulation Research, Assessment, and Outcomes, Zamierowski Institute for Experiential Learning, and assistant professor, Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2018 May;93(5):786-793. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002081.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000002081
PMID:29210754
Abstract

PURPOSE

Emergency physicians (EPs) regularly manage multiple patients simultaneously, often making time-sensitive decisions around priorities for multiple patients. Few studies have explored physician cognition in multipatient scenarios. The authors sought to develop a conceptual framework to describe how EPs think in busy, multipatient environments.

METHOD

From July 2014 to May 2015, a qualitative study was conducted at McMaster University, using a think-aloud protocol to examine how 10 attending EPs and 10 junior residents made decisions in multipatient environments. Participants engaged in the think-aloud exercise for five different simulated multipatient scenarios. Transcripts from recorded interviews were analyzed inductively, with an iterative process involving two independent coders, and compared between attendings and residents.

RESULTS

The attending EPs and junior residents used similar processes to prioritize patients in these multipatient scenarios. The think-aloud processes demonstrated a similar process used by almost all participants. The cognitive task of patient prioritization consisted of three components: a brief overview of the entire cohort of patients to determine a general strategy; an individual chart review, whereby the participant created a functional patient story from information available in a file (i.e., vitals, brief clinical history); and creation of a relative priority list. Compared with residents, the attendings were better able to construct deeper and more complex patient stories.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors propose a conceptual framework for how EPs prioritize care for multiple patients in complex environments. This study may be useful to teachers who train physicians to function more efficiently in busy clinical environments.

摘要

目的

急诊医师(EP)经常同时管理多个患者,经常围绕多个患者的优先级做出时间敏感的决策。很少有研究探讨过医师在多患者情况下的认知。作者试图开发一个概念框架来描述 EP 在繁忙的多患者环境中是如何思考的。

方法

2014 年 7 月至 2015 年 5 月,麦克马斯特大学进行了一项定性研究,使用出声思维协议来研究 10 名主治 EP 和 10 名初级住院医师如何在多患者环境中做出决策。参与者在 5 种不同的模拟多患者场景中进行出声思维练习。对记录访谈的转录本进行了归纳分析,由两名独立的编码员进行迭代过程,并在主治和住院医师之间进行比较。

结果

主治 EP 和初级住院医师在这些多患者场景中使用类似的过程来确定患者的优先级。出声思维过程展示了几乎所有参与者都使用的类似过程。患者优先级排序的认知任务包括三个组成部分:简要概述整个患者群体以确定一般策略;对个人图表进行审查,参与者从文件中(即生命体征、简要临床病史)可用的信息中创建一个功能患者故事;并创建一个相对优先级列表。与住院医师相比,主治医生能够更好地构建更深层次和更复杂的患者故事。

结论

作者提出了一个概念框架,说明 EP 如何在复杂环境中为多个患者确定护理优先级。这项研究可能对培训医生在繁忙的临床环境中更有效地工作的教师有用。

相似文献

1
Managing Multiplicity: Conceptualizing Physician Cognition in Multipatient Environments.管理多样性:多患者环境中医生认知的概念化。
Acad Med. 2018 May;93(5):786-793. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002081.
2
Coaching for Chaos: A Qualitative Study of Instructional Methods for Multipatient Management in the Emergency Department.应对混乱的指导:急诊科多患者管理教学方法的定性研究
AEM Educ Train. 2018 Dec 28;3(2):145-155. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10312. eCollection 2019 Apr.
3
Characterizing novice-expert differences in macrocognition: an exploratory study of cognitive work in the emergency department.描述宏观认知中新手-专家差异:对急诊科认知工作的探索性研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;61(1):96-109. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.08.034. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
4
Failure to flow: An exploration of learning and teaching in busy, multi-patient environments using an interpretive description method.流动失败:运用解释性描述方法对繁忙的多患者环境中的学习与教学进行的探索。
Perspect Med Educ. 2017 Dec;6(6):380-387. doi: 10.1007/s40037-017-0384-7.
5
Exploring the clinical decision-making used by experienced cardiorespiratory physiotherapists: A mixed method qualitative design of simulation, video recording and think aloud techniques.探索经验丰富的心肺物理治疗师的临床决策过程:一项采用模拟、视频记录和出声思考技术的混合方法定性研究设计。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
6
Multiple encounter simulation for high-acuity multipatient environment training.针对高 acuity 多患者环境培训的多次遭遇模拟。 (注:“acuity”常见释义为“敏锐;敏锐度” ,这里可能是特定医学环境下的术语,不太明确其准确含义)
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Dec;14(12):1141-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.05.015.
7
Understanding the exercise habits of residents and attending physicians: a mixed methodology study.了解住院医师和主治医师的锻炼习惯:一项混合方法研究。
Fam Med. 2015 Feb;47(2):118-23.
8
How do supervising physicians decide to entrust residents with unsupervised tasks? A qualitative analysis.指导医师如何决定让住院医师承担无人监督的任务?一项定性分析。
J Hosp Med. 2014 Mar;9(3):169-75. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2150. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
9
Emergency Physicians' Perceptions and Decision-making Processes Regarding Patients Presenting with Palpitations.急诊医生对心悸患者的认知及决策过程
J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):236-43.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 May 2.
10
Clinical Reasoning in the Ward Setting: A Rapid Response Scenario for Residents and Attendings.病房环境中的临床推理:住院医师和主治医师的快速反应场景
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Sep 27;15:10834. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10834.

引用本文的文献

1
Connecting pathogen transmission and healthcare worker cognition: a cognitive task analysis of infection prevention and control practices during simulated patient care.连接病原体传播和医护人员认知:模拟患者护理期间感染预防和控制实践的认知任务分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Jun 19;33(7):419-431. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016230.
2
Evaluating the Effect of Nursing-Performed Point-of-Care Ultrasound on Septic Emergency Department Patients.评估护理人员实施的床旁超声对急诊科脓毒症患者的影响。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 16;15(6):e40519. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40519. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
From Innovation to Intrapreneurship: Fostering academic success via the GridlockED project and innovation fund.
从创新到内部创业:通过GridlockED项目和创新基金促进学术成功。
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Nov 21;6(6):e10816. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10816. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Feeling the flow with a serious game workshop: GridlockED as Medical Education 2 study (GAME2 study).通过一个严肃游戏工作坊感受流程:GridlockED作为医学教育2研究(GAME2研究)。
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Mar 2;5(3):e10576. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10576. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Using Observation to Determine Teachable Moments Within a Serious Game: A GridlockED as Medical Education (GAME) Study.利用观察确定严肃游戏中的可教时刻:一项以医疗教育为主题的GridlockED(游戏)研究
AEM Educ Train. 2020 May 23;5(2):e10456. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10456. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
An interview study with medical scribes on how their work may alleviate clinician burnout through delegated health IT tasks.一项针对医学抄写员的访谈研究,探讨他们的工作如何通过委托的健康信息技术任务来缓解临床医生的职业倦怠。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Apr 23;28(5):907-914. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa345.
7
Faculty-lead Opinions on Workplace-based Methods for Graduated Managerial Teaching (FLOW MGMT): A National Cross-sectional Survey of Canadian Emergency Medicine Lead Educators.教师主导的关于基于工作场所的研究生管理教学方法的意见(FLOW MGMT):加拿大急诊医学首席教育工作者的全国横断面调查。
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Jan 20;5(1):19-27. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10429. eCollection 2021 Jan.
8
Multitasking behaviors and provider outcomes in emergency department physicians: two consecutive, observational and multi-source studies.急诊医师的多重任务行为和绩效:两项连续的观察性多源研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 7;29(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00824-8.
9
Coaching for Chaos: A Qualitative Study of Instructional Methods for Multipatient Management in the Emergency Department.应对混乱的指导:急诊科多患者管理教学方法的定性研究
AEM Educ Train. 2018 Dec 28;3(2):145-155. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10312. eCollection 2019 Apr.