• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理社会因素对左心室辅助装置植入后的结果有影响吗?

Do Psychosocial Factors Have Any Impact on Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation?

机构信息

From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 2018 Jul/Aug;64(4):e43-e47. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000736.

DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000000736
PMID:29210773
Abstract

Psychosocial factors have been show to impact survival and outcomes in a number of different diseases, including heart failure and patients receiving heart transplantation. With the increasing utilization of these devices, it is important to identify risk factors that could impact post-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) outcomes. This study was a single center, retrospective analysis of 238 patients who underwent implantation of a LVAD between July 27, 2004, and July 21, 2016, at The University of Nebraska Medical Center. Data collected include length of stay, number of readmission, alive status at 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year, as well as multiple psychosocial factors including history of drug abuse, history of alcohol abuse, history of noncompliance, history of anxiety, and history of depression, among others. Outcomes were calculated using univariate and multivariate analyses with SAS Version 9.4. None of the psychosocial factors assessed in this study showed statistical significance in predicting 30 day or 6 month mortality, but patients who smoked at the time of admission for LVAD implantation had higher mortality at 1 year (odds ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval, 1.226-15.898, p = 0.011.) Patients with a diagnosis of depression had higher numbers of readmissions compared with those without depression (p = 0.048) with the number of readmissions further increased in patients with a diagnosis of both depression and anxiety (p = 0.0074). Psychosocial determinants do not appear to have a significant effect on mortality, but can result in increased risk of readmission if not adequately addressed before implantation and continually monitored postimplantation.

摘要

社会心理因素已被证明会影响多种疾病的存活和结局,包括心力衰竭和接受心脏移植的患者。随着这些设备的应用越来越广泛,确定可能影响左心室辅助装置(LVAD)术后结果的风险因素非常重要。这项研究是对 2004 年 7 月 27 日至 2016 年 7 月 21 日在内布拉斯加大学医学中心接受 LVAD 植入术的 238 名患者进行的单中心回顾性分析。收集的数据包括住院时间、再入院次数、术后 30 天、180 天和 1 年的存活情况,以及包括药物滥用史、酒精滥用史、不遵医嘱史、焦虑史和抑郁史在内的多个社会心理因素。使用 SAS 版本 9.4 进行单变量和多变量分析来计算结果。本研究评估的社会心理因素均与 30 天或 6 个月死亡率无统计学意义,但在接受 LVAD 植入术时吸烟的患者在 1 年内死亡率更高(比值比 4.6,95%置信区间 1.226-15.898,p=0.011)。与无抑郁的患者相比,被诊断为抑郁症的患者再入院次数更多(p=0.048),而同时被诊断为抑郁症和焦虑症的患者再入院次数进一步增加(p=0.0074)。社会心理因素似乎对死亡率没有显著影响,但如果在植入前未得到充分解决并在植入后持续监测,可能会增加再入院的风险。

相似文献

1
Do Psychosocial Factors Have Any Impact on Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation?心理社会因素对左心室辅助装置植入后的结果有影响吗?
ASAIO J. 2018 Jul/Aug;64(4):e43-e47. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000736.
2
Utility of the Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplantation in Patients Undergoing Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.持续血流左心室辅助装置植入患者中移植候选者心理社会评估的效用
Prog Transplant. 2018 Sep;28(3):220-225. doi: 10.1177/1526924818781559. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
3
Present-Day Hospital Readmissions after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Large Single-Center Study.左心室辅助装置植入术后的当代医院再入院情况:一项大型单中心研究。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Oct 1;42(5):419-29. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4971. eCollection 2015 Oct.
4
Psychosocial characteristics and outcomes in patients with left ventricular assist device implanted as destination therapy.接受作为终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置植入患者的心理社会特征及结局
Am Heart J. 2015 Nov;170(5):887-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Aug 16.
5
Factors determining post-operative readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后再入院的决定因素
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Oct;33(10):1041-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
6
Psychosocial Risk and Its Association With Outcomes in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.心理社会风险及其与连续血流左心室辅助装置患者结局的关系。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Sep;13(9):e006910. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.006910. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
7
Standardized Use of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation in LVAD Patients.斯坦福综合移植心理社会评估在 LVAD 患者中的标准化应用。
J Card Fail. 2019 Sep;25(9):735-743. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
8
Obesity as a Risk Factor for Consideration for Left Ventricular Assist Devices.肥胖作为左心室辅助装置植入考虑的一个风险因素。
J Card Fail. 2015 Oct;21(10):800-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
9
Impact of 30 Day Readmission After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后 30 天再入院的影响。
ASAIO J. 2019 Mar/Apr;65(3):252-256. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000812.
10
Echocardiographic variables after left ventricular assist device implantation associated with adverse outcome.左心室辅助装置植入术后超声心动图变量与不良预后的关系。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Nov;4(6):648-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.965335. Epub 2011 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing stress in LVAD recipients: Development of the LVAD Stress Questionnaire.评估左心室辅助装置(LVAD)接受者的压力:LVAD压力问卷的编制
Int J Artif Organs. 2025 Jun;48(6):393-398. doi: 10.1177/03913988251337881. Epub 2025 May 30.
2
The effects of demographic, psychosocial, and socioeconomic characteristics on access to heart transplantation and left ventricular assist device.人口统计学、心理社会和社会经济特征对心脏移植及左心室辅助装置获取的影响。
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Jul 5;17:100172. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100172. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Depression among Patients with an Implanted Left Ventricular Assist Device: Uncovering Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Implications for Patient Care.
植入左心室辅助装置患者的抑郁:揭示病理生理机制及其对患者护理的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jul 10;24(14):11270. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411270.
4
The History of Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Comparison of Outcomes: HeartWare, HeartMate II, HeartMate 3, and the Future of Mechanical Circulatory Support.持久左心室辅助装置的历史及结果比较:HeartWare、HeartMate II、HeartMate 3与机械循环支持的未来
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 5;11(7):2022. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072022.
5
Sex Differences in Recovery and Device Replacement After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation as Destination Therapy.作为心脏移植的终末期治疗,左心室辅助装置植入术后的恢复和设备更换存在性别差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar;11(5):e023294. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023294. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
6
Value of psychosocial evaluation for left ventricular assist device candidates.左心室辅助装置候选人的心理社会评估价值。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Mar;165(3):1111-1121.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.065. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
7
Psychological Spectrum Experienced by Heart Failure Patients After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入后心力衰竭患者所经历的心理谱
Cureus. 2020 Aug 11;12(8):e9671. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9671.
8
Psychosocial Risk and Its Association With Outcomes in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.心理社会风险及其与连续血流左心室辅助装置患者结局的关系。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Sep;13(9):e006910. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.006910. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
9
Depression, anxiety, fear of progression, and emotional arousal in couples after left ventricular assist device implantation.左心室辅助装置植入后夫妻双方的抑郁、焦虑、进展恐惧和情绪激动。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;7(5):3022-3028. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12927. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
10
The Approach to the Psychosocial Evaluation of Cardiac Transplant and Mechanical Circulatory Support Candidates.心脏移植和机械循环支持候选者的心理社会评估方法
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2019 Dec;16(6):201-211. doi: 10.1007/s11897-019-00443-0.