Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cancer. 2018 Mar 15;124(6):1132-1140. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31171. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
Strategies to improve bone health care in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are not consistently implemented. The authors conducted a phase 2 randomized controlled trial of 2 education-based models-of-care interventions to determine their feasibility and ability to improve bone health care.
A single-center parallel-group randomized controlled trial of men with prostate cancer who were receiving ADT was performed. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to 1) a patient bone health pamphlet and brief recommendations for their family physician (BHP+FP); 2) a BHP and support from a bone health care coordinator (BHP+BHCC); or 3) usual care. The primary efficacy outcome was receipt of a bone mineral density (BMD) test within 6 months. Secondary efficacy outcomes included guideline-appropriate calcium and vitamin D use and bisphosphonate prescriptions for men at high fracture risk. Feasibility endpoints included recruitment, retention, satisfaction, contamination, and outcome capture. The main analysis used logistic regression with a 1-sided P of .10. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT02043236).
A total of 119 men were recruited. The BHP+BHCC strategy was associated with a greater percentage of men undergoing a BMD test compared with the usual-care group (78% vs 36%; P<.001). BMD ordering also was found to be increased with the BHP+FP strategy (58% vs 36%; P = .047). Both strategies were associated with higher percentages of patients using calcium and vitamin D, but only the BHP+FP arm was statistically significant (P = .039). No men were detected to be at high fracture risk. All but one feasibility endpoint was met.
Educational strategies to improve bone health care appear feasible and are associated with improved BMD ordering in men receiving ADT. Cancer 2018;124:1132-40. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
在接受雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)的男性中,改善骨骼保健的策略并未得到一致实施。作者开展了一项 2 期、基于教育的两种护理模式干预的随机对照试验,以确定这些干预措施的可行性和改善骨骼保健护理的能力。
开展了一项针对正在接受 ADT 的前列腺癌男性的单中心、平行组、随机对照试验。参与者按 1:1:1 的比例随机分为三组,分别接受 1)患者骨骼健康小册子和给家庭医生的简要建议(BHP+FP);2)BHP 和骨骼保健协调员的支持(BHP+BHCC);或 3)常规护理。主要疗效结局是在 6 个月内接受骨密度(BMD)检测。次要疗效结局包括指南推荐的钙和维生素 D 应用,以及高骨折风险男性的双膦酸盐处方。可行性结局指标包括招募、保留、满意度、污染和结局采集。主要分析采用单侧 P 值为.10 的逻辑回归。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(标识符 NCT02043236)。
共纳入 119 名男性。与常规护理组相比,BHP+BHCC 策略使更多男性接受 BMD 检测(78%比 36%;P<.001)。还发现 BHP+FP 策略增加了 BMD 检测的开具(58%比 36%;P = .047)。两种策略均与更高比例的患者使用钙和维生素 D 相关,但只有 BHP+FP 组有统计学意义(P = .039)。未发现任何男性有高骨折风险。除了一个可行性结局指标外,其他所有结局指标均达标。
改善骨骼保健护理的教育策略似乎可行,并与接受 ADT 的男性的 BMD 检测开具增加相关。癌症 2018;124:1132-40。©2017 美国癌症协会。