• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有共病性慢性精神疾病个体的糖尿病护理质量:基于性别的分析。

Quality of Diabetes Care for Individuals with Comorbid Chronic Psychotic Illness: A Sex-Based Analysis.

机构信息

1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada .

2 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences , Toronto, Canada .

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Mar;27(3):290-296. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6490. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2017.6490
PMID:29211592
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is common among individuals with chronic psychotic illness, yet they receive lower quality of diabetes care than those without psychosis. Men usually receive higher quality diabetes care than women, but whether this holds true in chronic psychotic illness populations is unknown. We aimed to determine whether quality of diabetes care differs between men and women with chronic psychotic illness.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study used Ontario health administrative data to compare women and men with comorbid chronic psychotic illness and diabetes mellitus (2011-2013). The primary outcome was adherence to diabetes monitoring guidelines, defined as ≥1 retinal exam, ≥4 hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) tests, and ≥1 dyslipidemia test during a 2-year period. Logistic regression models compared women to men to generate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and confidence intervals (95% CI), adjusting for potential confounding variables.

RESULTS

Women with chronic psychotic illness (n = 13,972) were slightly more likely to receive guideline-adherent diabetes monitoring than men (n = 12,287) (25.2% vs. 23.0%; aOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.30), including a greater likelihood of receiving ≥1 retinal exam (aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08-1.19) and ≥4 HbA1c tests (aOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.12). There was no difference in receipt of ≥1 dyslipidemia test (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 0.99-1.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of diabetes monitoring is similarly poor in women and men with chronic psychotic illness, with women receiving only marginally more optimal monitoring than men. This differs from patterns in the general population, and could have implications when designing and implementing interventions to improve diabetes care in women and men with chronic psychotic illness.

摘要

背景

糖尿病在患有慢性精神病的个体中很常见,但他们接受的糖尿病护理质量低于没有精神病的个体。男性通常比女性接受更高质量的糖尿病护理,但这种情况在慢性精神病患者中是否成立尚不清楚。我们旨在确定慢性精神病患者中男性和女性的糖尿病护理质量是否存在差异。

方法

这项基于人群的队列研究使用安大略省的健康管理数据,比较了 2011 年至 2013 年期间患有合并慢性精神病和糖尿病的男性和女性。主要结局是遵守糖尿病监测指南的情况,定义为在 2 年内进行≥1 次视网膜检查、≥4 次糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测和≥1 次血脂检测。使用逻辑回归模型比较女性与男性,以生成调整后的优势比(aOR)和置信区间(95%CI),并调整潜在的混杂变量。

结果

患有慢性精神病的女性(n=13972)比男性(n=12287)更有可能接受符合指南的糖尿病监测(25.2%对 23.0%;aOR 1.20,95%CI 1.10-1.30),包括更有可能进行≥1 次视网膜检查(aOR 1.13,95%CI 1.08-1.19)和≥4 次 HbA1c 检测(aOR 1.06,95%CI 1.01-1.12)。在接受≥1 次血脂检测方面,差异无统计学意义(aOR 1.04,95%CI 0.99-1.11)。

结论

患有慢性精神病的女性和男性的糖尿病监测质量同样较差,女性仅比男性接受略多的最佳监测。这与一般人群的模式不同,在设计和实施干预措施以改善患有慢性精神病的女性和男性的糖尿病护理时,可能会产生影响。

相似文献

1
Quality of Diabetes Care for Individuals with Comorbid Chronic Psychotic Illness: A Sex-Based Analysis.患有共病性慢性精神疾病个体的糖尿病护理质量:基于性别的分析。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Mar;27(3):290-296. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6490. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
2
Mental health status and gender as risk factors for onset of physical illness over 10 years.心理健康状况和性别作为10年间身体疾病发病的风险因素。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Jan;68(1):64-70. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202838. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
3
Physical health and gender as risk factors for usage of services for mental illness.身体健康和性别作为精神疾病服务使用的风险因素。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Oct;68(10):971-8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-203844. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
4
Diabetes and psychiatric illness in the total population of Stockholm.斯德哥尔摩总人口中的糖尿病与精神疾病
J Psychosom Res. 2014 Sep;77(3):169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.06.012. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
5
Chronic physical conditions and risk for perinatal mental illness: A population-based retrospective cohort study.慢性躯体疾病与围产期精神疾病风险:基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Aug 26;16(8):e1002864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002864. eCollection 2019 Aug.
6
Diabetes quality of care and outcomes: Comparison of individuals with and without schizophrenia.糖尿病护理质量与结局:精神分裂症患者与非精神分裂症患者的比较。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017 May;46:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 11.
7
Quality and Predictors of Diabetes Care Among Patients With Schizophrenia: A Danish Nationwide Study.精神分裂症患者的糖尿病护理质量及其预测因素:一项丹麦全国性研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Feb 1;69(2):179-185. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600460. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
8
Trends in sex differences in the receipt of quality of care indicators among adults with diabetes: United States 2002-2011.2002 - 2011年美国糖尿病成年患者接受医疗质量指标方面的性别差异趋势
BMC Endocr Disord. 2017 Jun 6;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12902-017-0183-5.
9
Rates of Mental Illness and Addiction among High-Cost Users of Medical Services in Ontario.安大略省医疗服务高成本使用者中的精神疾病和成瘾率。
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;61(6):358-66. doi: 10.1177/0706743716644764.
10
Mental comorbidity and quality of diabetes care under Medicaid: a 50-state analysis.医疗补助计划下的精神共病与糖尿病护理质量:50 个州的分析。
Med Care. 2012 May;50(5):428-33. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318245a528.

引用本文的文献

1
Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.加拿大临床实践的不当使用:系统评价。
CMAJ. 2022 Feb 28;194(8):E279-E296. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.211416.
2
Stroke care and case fatality in people with and without schizophrenia: a retrospective cohort study.伴有和不伴有精神分裂症人群的卒中护理和病死率:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 10;11(6):e044766. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044766.
3
Sex differences in the risk of vascular disease associated with diabetes.糖尿病相关血管疾病风险的性别差异。
Biol Sex Differ. 2020 Jan 3;11(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13293-019-0277-z.