Yang Derek, Davies April, Burge Bailey, Watkins Phillip, Dissanaike Sharmila
1 Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center , School of Medicine, Lubbock, Texas.
2 University Medical Center , Lubbock, Texas.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;19(1):65-70. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.080. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
The standard treatment of necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) includes extensive surgical debridement. Care of these debridements is challenging because of the size of the wound and associated pain. A potential solution is to leave the wounds open-to-air in the period after the initial debridement, allowing for regular inspection at bedside while reducing pain associated with frequent dressing changes. We evaluated the feasibility of this approach from a pain control standpoint.
An audit of wound care modalities used on adult patients with NSTI admitted to a regional burn center between January 2009 and May 2014 was performed. Patients with at least one operation were included. Those opting for palliative care were excluded. Wound care was divided into four categories: open-to-air (OTA), negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), packing, and ointment. Wound care, pain score, pain medication use, and number of operations were collected for the first seven days after initial debridement. Pain management was assessed by pain scores. Analgesic use was measured and compared using conversion to morphine milligram equivalents (MME).
Ninety-six patients were included; 67% were men with average age of 50 years, resulting in a total of 672 days of wound care evaluated: 69 days of OTA, 127 days of NPWT, 200 days of packing, and 126 days of ointment (150 days were undocumented). Average daily pain score from all wound care modalities was 2.00. Negative pressure wound therapy had the highest reported daily pain score (2.18, p = 0.034), whereas OTA had the lowest pain score (1.63, p < 0.05). Mortality was lower in the OTA cohort but was not statistically significant; there were no other differences in long-term outcome.
Leaving wounds OTA is a safe and viable option in the immediate post-debridement period of NSTI to reduce pain, while permitting frequent re-evaluation for quick recognition of disease progression and repeat operative debridement if necessary.
坏死性软组织感染(NSTI)的标准治疗包括广泛的手术清创。由于伤口面积大及相关疼痛,对这些清创伤口的护理具有挑战性。一种潜在的解决办法是在初次清创后的一段时间内让伤口敞开暴露于空气中,这样既能在床边进行定期检查,又能减轻因频繁更换敷料带来的疼痛。我们从疼痛控制的角度评估了这种方法的可行性。
对2009年1月至2014年5月间入住某地区烧伤中心的成年NSTI患者所采用的伤口护理方式进行了一项审计。纳入至少接受过一次手术的患者。选择姑息治疗的患者被排除。伤口护理分为四类:敞开暴露于空气中(OTA)、负压伤口治疗(NPWT)、填塞和涂抹药膏。收集初次清创后前七天的伤口护理情况、疼痛评分、止痛药物使用情况及手术次数。通过疼痛评分评估疼痛管理。使用转换为吗啡毫克当量(MME)的方法测量并比较镇痛药物的使用情况。
纳入96例患者;67%为男性,平均年龄50岁,共评估了672天的伤口护理情况:OTA护理69天,NPWT护理127天,填塞护理200天,涂抹药膏护理126天(150天记录缺失)。所有伤口护理方式的平均每日疼痛评分为2.00。负压伤口治疗报告的每日疼痛评分最高(2.18,p = 0.034),而OTA的疼痛评分最低(1.63,p < 0.05)。OTA组的死亡率较低,但无统计学意义;长期结局无其他差异。
在NSTI清创后的即刻阶段,让伤口敞开暴露于空气中是一种安全可行的选择,可减轻疼痛,同时允许频繁重新评估以便快速识别疾病进展,必要时可重复进行手术清创。