Corli Oscar, Roberto Anna, Bennett Michael I, Galli Francesca, Corsi Nicole, Rulli Eliana, Antonione Raffaella
Pain and Palliative Care Research Unit, Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy.
Academic Unit of Palliative Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K.
Pain Pract. 2018 Jul;18(6):748-757. doi: 10.1111/papr.12669. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
The response to opioids is not always positive in cancer patients. A considerable proportion of patients do not respond (nonresponders [NRs]) or experience severe toxicity. The aim of this analysis was to assess the role of demographic characteristics, pain features, comorbidities, and ongoing therapy on the lack of efficacy and on the occurrence of severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
This is a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial that involved 520 patients and aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4 strong opioids. Patients who presented with unchanged or worsened pain compared to the first visit were considered to be NRs. As for toxicity, severe ADRs with an incidence of greater than 10% were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic models were used.
498 patients were analyzed. Liver metastases and breakthrough pain (BTP) were found to increase the risk for nonresponse. Conversely, a high basal pain intensity significantly decreased the same risk. Constipation risk was worsened by previous weak opioid therapy but decreased with aging and with the use of transdermal opioids. Risk for drowsiness was aggravated by bone metastases and concomitant treatment with anticoagulant, antidiabetic, and central nervous system drugs. Risk for confusion increased with antidiabetics, antibiotics, and previous weak opioid therapy but decreased when fentanyl was used. Occurrence of nausea increased in patients with a high rating on the Karnofsky Performance Status Index. Risk for xerostomia was higher in women and in patients treated with antidiabetic or long-term opioids.
Several clinical variables are correlated with opioid response in cancer patients. In particular, the presence of BTP is associated with nonresponse. Additionally, patients who receive polypharmacological therapy are more likely to experience opioid adverse events.
癌症患者对阿片类药物的反应并非总是积极的。相当一部分患者没有反应(无反应者[NRs])或出现严重毒性。本分析的目的是评估人口统计学特征、疼痛特征、合并症和正在进行的治疗对疗效不佳和严重药物不良反应(ADR)发生的作用。
这是一项对520例患者进行的随机对照试验的事后分析,旨在评估4种强阿片类药物的疗效和安全性。与首次就诊相比,疼痛未改善或加重的患者被视为无反应者。至于毒性,评估了发生率大于10%的严重ADR。使用单变量和多变量逻辑模型。
分析了498例患者。发现肝转移和爆发性疼痛(BTP)会增加无反应的风险。相反,高基础疼痛强度会显著降低相同风险。既往使用弱阿片类药物治疗会增加便秘风险,但随着年龄增长和使用透皮阿片类药物,便秘风险会降低。骨转移以及与抗凝剂、抗糖尿病药和中枢神经系统药物同时治疗会加重嗜睡风险。使用抗糖尿病药、抗生素和既往使用弱阿片类药物治疗会增加意识模糊风险,但使用芬太尼时风险会降低。卡诺夫斯基功能状态指数评分高的患者恶心发生率增加。女性以及接受抗糖尿病药或长期使用阿片类药物治疗的患者口干风险更高。
几个临床变量与癌症患者的阿片类药物反应相关。特别是,BTP的存在与无反应相关。此外,接受多药联合治疗的患者更有可能发生阿片类药物不良事件。