Wheeler Sarah E, Liu Li, Blair Harry C, Sivak Richard, Longo Nancy, Tischler Jeffery, Mulvey Kathryn, Palmer Octavia M Peck
Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, S723 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Clinical Laboratory Building, 3477 Euler Way, Room 3014, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Dec 8;10(1):725. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-3050-6.
Thyroglobulin (Tg) measurements assess recurrence in post-thyroidectomy thyroid cancer patients. Tg measurements by enzyme immunoassays (EIA) can be falsely elevated by interference from Tg autoantibodies (TgAb). Radioimmunoassay (RIA) is less susceptible to TgAb interference and has been the standard-of-care test for TgAb positive patients. Recently developed liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods may eliminate TgAb interference. We assessed the performance of Tg measurements by EIA, RIA and LC-MS/MS to evaluate TgAb interference differences.
We measured TgAb and Tg in 50 plasma samples from 40 patients in whom Tg measurement was part of their routine follow-up and 10 healthy volunteers. Discrepancy between EIA and both LC-MS/MS and RIA was observed at low Tg concentrations (≤ 7.55 ng/mL) in TgAb positive specimens (LC-MS/MS = 1.9 * EIA - 0.03, r = 0.68). RIA and LC-MS/MS Tg measurements in TgAb positive specimens with low Tg concentrations had improved correlation but demonstrated bias (LC MS/MS = 0.6 * RIA - 1.4, r = 0.90). Disagreement between methods may be attributed to LC-MS/MS reported Tg concentrations as undetectable compared to RIA. It seems likely that most discrepant cases are falsely elevated in RIA due to TgAb interference, however, some cases appear below the detection limit of LC-MS/MS; implementation of LC-MS/MS by clinicians will require lower detection limits.
甲状腺球蛋白(Tg)检测用于评估甲状腺癌患者甲状腺切除术后的复发情况。酶免疫分析法(EIA)检测Tg时,可能会受到Tg自身抗体(TgAb)的干扰而出现假升高。放射免疫分析法(RIA)受TgAb干扰的影响较小,一直是TgAb阳性患者的标准检测方法。最近开发的液相色谱串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)可能会消除TgAb的干扰。我们评估了EIA、RIA和LC-MS/MS检测Tg的性能,以评估TgAb干扰的差异。
我们检测了40例患者(其Tg检测是常规随访的一部分)和10名健康志愿者的50份血浆样本中的TgAb和Tg。在TgAb阳性标本中,低Tg浓度(≤7.55 ng/mL)时观察到EIA与LC-MS/MS和RIA之间存在差异(LC-MS/MS = 1.9 * EIA - 0.03,r = 0.68)。低Tg浓度的TgAb阳性标本中,RIA和LC-MS/MS检测Tg的相关性有所改善,但存在偏差(LC-MS/MS = 0.6 * RIA - 1.4,r = 0.90)。方法之间的差异可能归因于与RIA相比,LC-MS/MS报告的Tg浓度为不可检测。似乎大多数差异病例在RIA中由于TgAb干扰而出现假升高,然而,一些病例似乎低于LC-MS/MS的检测限;临床医生实施LC-MS/MS将需要更低的检测限。