Neuro-Cognitive Psychology, Bielefeld University, Germany; 'Cognitive Interaction Technology' Cluster of Excellence CITEC, Bielefeld University, Germany.
Neuro-Cognitive Psychology, Bielefeld University, Germany; 'Cognitive Interaction Technology' Cluster of Excellence CITEC, Bielefeld University, Germany.
Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
Many everyday tasks involve successive visual-search episodes with changing targets. Converging evidence suggests that these targets are retained in visual working memory (VWM) and bias attention from there. It is unknown whether all or only search-relevant features of a VWM template bias attention during search. Bias signals might be configured exclusively to task-relevant features so that only search-relevant features bias attention. Alternatively, VWM might maintain objects in the form of bound features. Then, all template features will bias attention in an object-based manner, so that biasing effects are ranked by feature relevance. Here, we investigated whether search-irrelevant VWM template features bias attention. Participants had to saccade to a target opposite a distractor. A colored cue depicted the target prior to each search trial. The target was predefined only by its identity, while its color was irrelevant. When target and cue matched not only in identity (search-relevant) but also in color (search-irrelevant), saccades went more often and faster directly to the target than without any color match (Experiment 1). When introducing a cue-distractor color match (Experiment 2), direct target saccades were most likely when target and cue matched in the search-irrelevant color and least likely in case of a cue-distractor color match. When cue and target were never colored the same (Experiment 3), cue-colored distractors still captured the eyes more often than different-colored distractors despite color being search-irrelevant. As participants were informed about the misleading color, the result argues against a strategical and voluntary usage of color. Instead, search-irrelevant features biased attention obligatorily arguing for involuntary top-down control by object-based VWM templates.
许多日常任务都涉及到具有变化目标的连续视觉搜索事件。越来越多的证据表明,这些目标被保留在视觉工作记忆(VWM)中,并从那里引导注意力。目前还不清楚 VWM 模板在搜索过程中引导注意力的是所有还是只有与搜索相关的特征。偏向信号可能专门针对任务相关的特征进行配置,以便只有与搜索相关的特征引导注意力。或者,VWM 可能以绑定特征的形式保持物体。然后,所有模板特征都会以基于对象的方式引导注意力,因此偏向效应按特征相关性进行排序。在这里,我们研究了搜索不相关的 VWM 模板特征是否会引导注意力。参与者必须扫视到与分心物相对的目标。在每次搜索试验之前,用一个彩色提示来描述目标。目标仅通过其身份预先定义,而其颜色是无关的。当目标和提示不仅在身份(与搜索相关)上匹配,而且在颜色(与搜索不相关)上匹配时,与没有任何颜色匹配相比,扫视更容易且更快地直接指向目标(实验 1)。当引入提示-分心物颜色匹配时(实验 2),当目标和提示在搜索不相关的颜色上匹配时,直接指向目标的扫视最有可能,而在提示-分心物颜色匹配的情况下则最不可能。当提示和目标从未被涂成相同的颜色时(实验 3),尽管颜色与搜索无关,提示颜色的分心物仍然比不同颜色的分心物更频繁地吸引眼睛。由于参与者被告知了误导性的颜色,结果表明颜色不是策略性和自愿使用的,而是搜索不相关的特征强制性地引导注意力,这证明了基于对象的 VWM 模板具有强制性的自上而下的控制。