• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作记忆中的资源分配:对视觉搜索的理论和经验影响。

Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, 40 Boulevard du Pont d'Arve, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1093-1111. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01881-5. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-021-01881-5
PMID:33733298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8367923/
Abstract

Recently, working memory (WM) has been conceptualized as a limited resource, distributed flexibly and strategically between an unlimited number of representations. In addition to improving the precision of representations in WM, the allocation of resources may also shape how these representations act as attentional templates to guide visual search. Here, we reviewed recent evidence in favor of this assumption and proposed three main principles that govern the relationship between WM resources and template-guided visual search. First, the allocation of resources to an attentional template has an effect on visual search, as it may improve the guidance of visual attention, facilitate target recognition, and/or protect the attentional template against interference. Second, the allocation of the largest amount of resources to a representation in WM is not sufficient to give this representation the status of attentional template and thus, the ability to guide visual search. Third, the representation obtaining the status of attentional template, whether at encoding or during maintenance, receives an amount of WM resources proportional to its relevance for visual search. Thus defined, the resource hypothesis of visual search constitutes a parsimonious and powerful framework, which provides new perspectives on previous debates and complements existing models of template-guided visual search.

摘要

最近,工作记忆(WM)被概念化为一种有限的资源,可以在无限数量的表示之间灵活和策略性地分配。除了提高 WM 中表示的精度外,资源的分配还可能影响这些表示如何作为注意模板来指导视觉搜索。在这里,我们回顾了支持这一假设的最新证据,并提出了支配 WM 资源和模板引导视觉搜索之间关系的三个主要原则。首先,将资源分配给注意模板会对视觉搜索产生影响,因为它可以改善视觉注意力的引导,促进目标识别,和/或保护注意模板免受干扰。其次,将最大数量的资源分配给 WM 中的表示并不足以赋予该表示注意模板的地位,从而赋予其引导视觉搜索的能力。第三,在编码或维持期间获得注意模板地位的表示会获得与其对视觉搜索的相关性成正比的 WM 资源量。因此,视觉搜索的资源假说构成了一个简洁而强大的框架,为以前的争论提供了新的视角,并补充了现有的模板引导视觉搜索模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6049/8367923/56d7e37b21bd/13423_2021_1881_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6049/8367923/f6199ee77b36/13423_2021_1881_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6049/8367923/56d7e37b21bd/13423_2021_1881_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6049/8367923/f6199ee77b36/13423_2021_1881_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6049/8367923/56d7e37b21bd/13423_2021_1881_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search.工作记忆中的资源分配:对视觉搜索的理论和经验影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1093-1111. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01881-5. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
The allocation of working memory resources determines the efficiency of attentional templates in single- and dual-target search.工作记忆资源的分配决定了注意模板在单目标和双目标搜索中的效率。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Dec;151(12):2977-2989. doi: 10.1037/xge0001239. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
3
Attentional templates are protected from retroactive interference during visual search: Converging evidence from event-related potentials.注意模板在视觉搜索中受到回溯干扰的保护:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Nov 12;162:108026. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108026. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
4
Visual working memory load disrupts the space-based attentional guidance of target selection.视觉工作记忆负荷会干扰基于空间的目标选择的注意力引导。
Br J Psychol. 2019 May;110(2):357-371. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12323. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
5
The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.视觉工作记忆和多个注意模板中的资源分配。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 May;45(5):645-658. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000637. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
6
The Reactivation of working memory representations affects attentional guidance.工作记忆表象的再激活影响注意力引导。
Psychophysiology. 2024 Mar;61(3):e14514. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14514. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
7
Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.视觉工作记忆负荷会干扰视觉搜索中模板引导的注意选择。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Dec;30(12):1902-1915. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01324. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
8
Is a search template an ordinary working memory? Comparing electrophysiological markers of working memory maintenance for visual search and recognition.搜索模板是一种普通的工作记忆吗?比较视觉搜索和识别中工作记忆维持的电生理标记。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;60:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 May 28.
9
Sharper attentional tuning with target templates in long-term compared to working memory.与工作记忆相比,在长期记忆中使用目标模板可以实现更敏锐的注意力调整。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1261-1269. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01898-w. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
10
Neural Representation of Working Memory Content Is Modulated by Visual Attentional Demand.工作记忆内容的神经表示受视觉注意力需求的调节。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Dec;29(12):2011-2024. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01174. Epub 2017 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Higher baseline alpha power is associated with faster responses in visual search.较高的基线阿尔法波功率与视觉搜索中更快的反应相关。
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 29:2025.08.29.673162. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.29.673162.
2
Coarse matching was sufficient to capture attention by working memory representations unless matching features with the target.粗略匹配足以通过工作记忆表征来吸引注意力,除非与目标匹配特征。 (此译文似乎不太通顺,可能原文存在一些表述不太清晰准确的问题,但按照要求严格翻译了。)
BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 3;13(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02522-5.
3
The Effects of Layout Order on Interface Complexity: An Eye-Tracking Study for Dashboard Design.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying the Attentional Impact of Working Memory Matching Targets and Distractors.量化工作记忆匹配目标与干扰项的注意力影响。
Vis cogn. 2019;27(5-8):452-466. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1634172. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
2
New templates interfere with existing templates depending on their respective priority in visual working memory.新模板会根据其在视觉工作记忆中的优先级干扰现有模板。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Nov;46(11):1313-1327. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000859. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
3
Preparatory Template Activation during Search for Alternating Targets.
布局顺序对界面复杂度的影响:仪表盘设计的眼动追踪研究
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 14;24(18):5966. doi: 10.3390/s24185966.
4
Effects of spatial location on distractor interference.空间位置对分心物干扰的影响。
J Vis. 2024 Sep 3;24(9):4. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.9.4.
5
Virtual reality gameplay classification illustrates the multidimensionality of visuospatial neglect.虚拟现实游戏玩法分类说明了视觉空间忽视的多维度性。
Brain Commun. 2024 May 3;6(4):fcae145. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae145. eCollection 2024.
6
Graded prioritisation of targets in search: reward diminishes the low prevalence effect.目标分级搜索中的优先化:奖励降低了低患病率效应。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Aug 4;8(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00507-9.
7
Directing memory content to attentional templates: The finiteness effect of predictive information.将记忆内容导向注意力模板:预测信息的有限性效应。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1082437. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1082437. eCollection 2022.
8
Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture.搜索模式而非注意窗口决定了注意捕获的程度。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Feb;86(2):457-470. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02582-4. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
9
Exploring how healthcare teams balance the neurodynamics of autonomous and collaborative behaviors: a proof of concept.探索医疗团队如何平衡自主行为与协作行为的神经动力学:概念验证
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 28;16:932468. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.932468. eCollection 2022.
10
Statistical learning in visual search reflects distractor rarity, not only attentional suppression.视觉搜索中的统计学习反映了分心物的稀有性,而不仅仅是注意力抑制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Oct;29(5):1890-1897. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02097-x. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
预备模板激活在交替目标搜索中。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Aug;32(8):1525-1535. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01565. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
4
Directed avoidance and its effect on visual working memory.定向回避及其对视觉工作记忆的影响。
Cognition. 2020 Aug;201:104277. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104277. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
5
What not to look for: Electrophysiological evidence that searchers prefer positive templates.勿寻:搜索者偏好正模板的电生理证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Mar 16;140:107376. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107376. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
6
Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection.情景记忆中恢复的目标特征引导注意力选择。
Cognition. 2020 Apr;197:104158. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104158. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
7
Electrophysiological correlates of the flexible allocation of visual working memory resources.视觉工作记忆资源灵活分配的电生理相关性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 19;9(1):19428. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55948-4.
8
Oscillatory Control over Representational States in Working Memory.工作记忆中表象状态的震荡控制。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Feb;24(2):150-162. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
9
Working Memory and Attention - A Conceptual Analysis and Review.工作记忆与注意力——概念分析与综述
J Cogn. 2019 Aug 8;2(1):36. doi: 10.5334/joc.58.
10
Attending object features interferes with visual working memory regardless of eye-movements.注意对象特征会干扰视觉工作记忆,无论是否有眼球运动。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Aug;45(8):1049-1061. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000651. Epub 2019 Apr 25.