Talebpour Mohammad, Ghiasnejad Omrani Naser, Imani Farsad, Shariat Moharari Reza, Pourfakhr Pejman, Khajavi Mohammad Reza
MD, Department of Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Sina Hospital, Hassan Abad Square, Tehran, Iran.
MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Sina Hospital, Hassan Abad Square, Tehran, Iran.
Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jul 22;7(4):e57810. doi: 10.5812/aapm.57810. eCollection 2017 Aug.
Laparoscopic gastric plication (LGP) is a technique in the restrictive category of bariatric procedures that reduces the gastric volume and increases intragastric pressure. Nausea and vomiting are the most common complications after this procedure. The goal of this research is to compare the combined effect of promethazine/dexamethasone versus Metoclopramide/ dexamethasone on the prevention of nausea and vomiting after LGP.
In recovery, the patients were divided into two groups, the Metoclopramide group which was given Metoclopramide 10 mg plus dexamethasone 4 mg/8 hours intravenous for 48 hours, and the promethazine group which was given promethazine 50 mg /12 hours, intramuscular for the first 24 hours and then promethazine 25 mg/12 hours for the next 24 hours plus dexamethasone 4 mg/8 hours intravenous for 48 hours. The frequency of nausea and vomiting, number of reflux episodes, frequency of epigastric fullness, and the duration of walking around q12 hours were recorded in the first 48 hours post-operation.
Eighty patients were enrolled into the study. Promethazine group were found to significantly reduce the incidence of PONV in the first 24 hours compared with the other group (41% vs. 97.5%), relative risk = 0.042 [95% CI = 0.006, 0.299]. The mean numbers of epigastric fullness and severity of epigastria pain were lower in the promethazine group (P = 0.01) and the total opioid requirement was also reduced in promethazine group (32.1 ± 2.6 VS .68.5 ± 4.6 mg). However, the patients in the promethazine group were more sedated, which caused the duration of walking q12 hours in this group to decrease.
In morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric plication, promethazine/dexametasone was more effective than Metoclopramide/dexametasone in preventing and reducing the incidence of nausea, epigastric fullness, and reflux. That combination was also more effective than Metoclopramide in reducing the severity of epigastric pain.
腹腔镜胃折叠术(LGP)是减肥手术中限制类技术,可减少胃容量并增加胃内压力。恶心和呕吐是该手术后最常见的并发症。本研究的目的是比较异丙嗪/地塞米松与甲氧氯普胺/地塞米松联合使用对预防LGP术后恶心和呕吐的效果。
在恢复过程中,患者被分为两组,甲氧氯普胺组静脉注射甲氧氯普胺10mg加地塞米松4mg/8小时,共48小时;异丙嗪组在前24小时肌肉注射异丙嗪50mg/12小时,然后在接下来的24小时肌肉注射异丙嗪25mg/12小时,加静脉注射地塞米松4mg/8小时,共48小时。记录术后前48小时恶心和呕吐的频率、反流发作次数、上腹部饱胀频率以及每12小时走动的持续时间。
80名患者纳入研究。发现异丙嗪组在术后前24小时预防恶心和呕吐的发生率显著低于另一组(41%对97.5%),相对风险=0.042[95%置信区间=0.006,0.299]。异丙嗪组上腹部饱胀的平均次数和上腹部疼痛的严重程度较低(P=0.01),异丙嗪组的总阿片类药物需求量也减少(32.1±2.6对68.5±4.6mg)。然而,异丙嗪组患者的镇静作用更强,导致该组每12小时走动的持续时间减少。
在接受腹腔镜胃折叠术的病态肥胖患者中,异丙嗪/地塞米松在预防和降低恶心、上腹部饱胀和反流的发生率方面比甲氧氯普胺/地塞米松更有效。该联合用药在减轻上腹部疼痛的严重程度方面也比甲氧氯普胺更有效。