• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[区域化对患者不利吗?一项基于奥斯陆救护车转运的登记研究]

[Is regionalization disadvantageous for patients? A registration study based on ambulance transports in Oslo].

作者信息

Stene-Larsen G, Hagen H

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 Feb 20;109(5):545-8.

PMID:2922713
Abstract

The number of transferrals between Oslo hospitals has been doubled since the hospital system was regionalized in 1982. Essentially, this development may be explained by the increased need to refer patients to the highly specialized hospitals because of recent years advances in medical technology. During a two month period in 1988, 4,841 admissions to hospitals in Oslo were registered, and 917 transferrals between hospitals. We found that patient-transport was adequate in 92% of the cases. However, ambulance personnel reported 389 cases (8%) of delayed admissions and unnecessary transferrals between the hospitals. In most cases, the real cause of the problems was a too rigid attitude among health workers. The inflexibility of the present system seems to be a major threat to the principle of regionalization. We propose a simple set of rules which will protect the principle and also the requests of the patients.

摘要

自1982年医院系统实行区域化以来,奥斯陆各医院之间的转诊数量增加了一倍。从本质上讲,这一发展可以解释为由于近年来医疗技术的进步,将患者转诊至高度专业化医院的需求增加。1988年的两个月时间里,奥斯陆各医院共登记了4841例入院病例,以及917例医院之间的转诊。我们发现,92%的病例中患者转运情况良好。然而,救护人员报告了389例(8%)延迟入院和医院之间不必要的转诊情况。在大多数情况下,问题的真正原因是医护人员态度过于僵化。现行系统的不灵活性似乎对区域化原则构成了重大威胁。我们提出了一套简单的规则,既能保护这一原则,又能满足患者的需求。

相似文献

1
[Is regionalization disadvantageous for patients? A registration study based on ambulance transports in Oslo].[区域化对患者不利吗?一项基于奥斯陆救护车转运的登记研究]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 Feb 20;109(5):545-8.
2
[Regionalization in Oslo. Attitude of health personnel].[奥斯陆的区域划分。卫生人员的态度]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 Feb 20;109(5):555-9.
3
[Attitudes of the population and patients to regionalization in Oslo].[奥斯陆民众及患者对区域化的态度]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 Feb 20;109(5):607-9.
4
[Should hospitals be allowed to transfer surplus patients? A study of the patient load situation at medical and surgical wards in regionalized hospitals in Oslo].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 Feb 20;109(5):610-1.
5
[Has regionalization fulfilled administrative expectations? Work load, utilization and therapeutic costs at somatic hospitals in Oslo].[区域化是否达到了行政预期?奥斯陆市综合医院的工作量、利用率及治疗费用]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 Feb 20;109(5):549-53.
6
[Local, central and regional functions. Obsolete concepts?].[局部、中枢和区域功能。过时的概念?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1990 Nov 30;110(29):3775-8.
7
[Use of beds in somatic hospitals in Oslo in 1986].1986年奥斯陆市综合医院病床的使用情况
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1989 Feb 20;109(5):603-6.
8
Hospital services in Oslo.奥斯陆的医院服务。
J Oslo City Hosp. 1979;29(5-6):51-71.
9
Child and provider restraints in ambulances: knowledge, opinions, and behaviors of emergency medical services providers.救护车中儿童及医护人员的约束措施:急救医疗服务人员的知识、观点及行为
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(8):886-92. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.03.562. Epub 2006 Jul 6.
10
A two-step medically based injury surveillance system--experiences from the Oslo injury register.
Accid Anal Prev. 2004 Nov;36(6):1003-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2003.12.001.