• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实体瘤反应评估标准 1.1 版与纳武利尤单抗治疗非小细胞肺癌患者免疫相关反应标准的一致性:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。

Concordance between the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 and the immune-related response criteria in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, 2-17-77 Higashi, Naniwa-cho, Amagasaki, Hyogo, 660-8550, Japan.

Department of Internal Medicine, Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Feb;81(2):333-337. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3498-z. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00280-017-3498-z
PMID:29230503
Abstract

PURPOSE

The immune-related response criteria (irRC) were proposed to incorporate pseudo-progression. However, the association between the irRC and overall survival (OS) has yet to be evaluated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the concordance between the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and the irRC in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab, as well as, to determine the relationship between these two response criteria and OS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 143 patients at three tertiary care hospitals in Japan between January and December 2016 (UMIN000022014).

RESULTS

The weighted kappa statistic for the two response criteria was 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.76). The Harrell's C-index was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.80) for the RECIST and 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.80) for the irRC, respectively. The difference between the two criteria was - 0.002 (95% CI - 0.05 to 0.04). The Moreau, O'Quigley, and Lellouch statistic was 0.03 for the RECIST and 0.17 for the irRC, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated a good concordance between the RECIST and the irRC for predicting OS in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab.

摘要

目的

免疫相关缓解标准(irRC)的提出是为了纳入假性进展。然而,irRC 与非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的总生存期(OS)之间的关联尚未得到评估。因此,本研究旨在评估nivolumab 治疗 NSCLC 患者中实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)1.1 版和 irRC 之间的一致性,并确定这两种反应标准与 OS 之间的关系。

方法

我们对 2016 年 1 月至 12 月在日本三家三级保健医院的 143 名患者进行了回顾性队列研究(UMIN000022014)。

结果

两种反应标准的加权 Kappa 统计量为 0.72(95%置信区间(CI)0.66-0.76)。RECIST 的 Harrell's C 指数为 0.74(95%CI 0.68-0.80),irRC 为 0.74(95%CI 0.68-0.80)。两种标准之间的差异为-0.002(95%CI-0.05 至 0.04)。RECIST 的 Moreau、O'Quigley 和 Lellouch 统计量为 0.03,irRC 为 0.17。

结论

我们证明了 RECIST 和 irRC 在预测 nivolumab 治疗 NSCLC 患者 OS 方面具有良好的一致性。

相似文献

1
Concordance between the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 and the immune-related response criteria in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.实体瘤反应评估标准 1.1 版与纳武利尤单抗治疗非小细胞肺癌患者免疫相关反应标准的一致性:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Feb;81(2):333-337. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3498-z. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
2
Radiologic Pseudoprogression during Anti-PD-1 Therapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.抗 PD-1 治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌中的影像学假性进展。
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Jul;13(7):978-986. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 May 5.
3
Comparison of RECIST to immune-related response criteria in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者中RECIST与免疫相关反应标准的比较。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Sep;80(3):591-598. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3396-4. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
4
Impact of immune-related adverse events on survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab: long-term outcomes from a multi-institutional analysis.免疫相关不良事件对纳武利尤单抗治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者生存的影响:多机构分析的长期结果。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb;145(2):479-485. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2805-3. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Nivolumab in Patients With Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Treated Beyond Progression.纳武利尤单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者进展后疗效和安全性的研究
Clin Lung Cancer. 2019 May;20(3):178-185.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
6
Nivolumab treatment beyond progressive disease in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.纳武利尤单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌进展后。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Mar;23(3):582-590. doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02452-1. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
7
Early depth of tumor shrinkage and treatment outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer treated using Nivolumab.纳武利尤单抗治疗非小细胞肺癌的早期肿瘤退缩深度与治疗结局。
Invest New Drugs. 2019 Dec;37(6):1257-1265. doi: 10.1007/s10637-019-00770-y. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
8
Effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: The real-life data.纳武利尤单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的有效性和安全性:真实世界数据。
Lung Cancer. 2018 Dec;126:217-223. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.11.015. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
9
Comparison Between F-FDG PET-Based and CT-Based Criteria in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Nivolumab.基于 F-FDG PET 和 CT 标准在接受纳武利尤单抗治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者中的比较。
J Nucl Med. 2020 Jul;61(7):990-998. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.233056. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
10
Real-world data from the Portuguese Nivolumab Expanded Access Program (EAP) in previously treated Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).葡萄牙尼伏鲁单抗拓展准入计划(EAP)中,先前治疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的真实世界数据。
Pulmonology. 2020 Jan-Feb;26(1):10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
High Pretreatment DHEA Is Associated with Inferior Immunotherapy Response in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.预处理时脱氢表雄酮水平较高与转移性非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗反应较差相关。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 14;16(6):1152. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061152.
2
Imaging evaluation of lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂治疗肺癌的影像学评价。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Nov 1;94(1127):20210228. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210228. Epub 2021 Sep 19.
3
Challenges of evaluating immunotherapy efficacy in solid tumors.实体瘤中评估免疫疗法疗效的挑战。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2019 Dec;31(6):853-861. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2019.06.02.
4
Multiple primary malignant neoplasms: A case report and literature review.多发性原发性恶性肿瘤:一例病例报告及文献综述
Oncol Lett. 2019 Oct;18(4):4210-4220. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10779. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
5
Which criteria should we use to evaluate the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors?我们应该使用哪些标准来评估免疫检查点抑制剂的疗效?
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jun;6(11):222. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.04.17.
6
The role of radiology in the evaluation of the immunotherapy efficacy.放射学在评估免疫治疗疗效中的作用。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 May;10(Suppl 13):S1438-S1446. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.130.