Suppr超能文献

蒸馏水诱发哮喘与运动诱发哮喘后不应期的比较。

Comparison between refractoriness after distilled water-induced asthma and exercise-induced asthma.

作者信息

Kivity S, Shalit Y, Greif J, Topilsky M

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.

出版信息

Ann Allergy. 1989 Mar;62(3):180-3.

PMID:2923326
Abstract

Inhalation of distilled water (DW) frequently induces bronchoconstriction in asthmatic patients. We compared the degree of refractoriness to repeated inhalation of DW to that of repeated exercise challenge in 14 asthmatics. Refractoriness was seen following inhalation of DW. The maximum drop in FEV1 (% of predicted) following the first challenge was 31 +/- 13% and the maximal drop following the second challenge was 18 +/- 9% (P less than .01). The pattern of the airway response seen during 45 minutes following repeated inhalation of DW and exercise was similar. Cross refractoriness was also seen when inhalation of DW followed exercise challenge. It was concluded that both stimuli probably share a common mechanism of action on the airway.

摘要

吸入蒸馏水(DW)常常会诱发哮喘患者的支气管收缩。我们比较了14名哮喘患者对重复吸入DW与重复运动激发试验的耐受程度。吸入DW后出现了耐受现象。第一次激发试验后FEV1(预测值的百分比)的最大下降幅度为31±13%,第二次激发试验后的最大下降幅度为18±9%(P<0.01)。重复吸入DW和运动后45分钟内观察到的气道反应模式相似。运动激发试验后再吸入DW时也出现了交叉耐受现象。得出的结论是,这两种刺激可能对气道具有共同的作用机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验