Anderson Heather D, Saseen Joseph J
Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Mar-Apr;9(2):224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.11.011. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Research has a prominent role within the field of pharmacy practice. However, no studies have assessed the importance of research methods in pharmacy education from the perspective of students, residents, or residency directors.
Questionnaires were administered online in spring 2014 to four respondent groups: University of Colorado fourth year PharmD (P4) students, post graduate year 1 (PGY1) residents, and PGY1 and post-graduate year 2 (PGY2) residency directors. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize respondents; t-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare groups of respondents.
Respondents included 255 PGY1 residency directors, 155 PGY2 residency directors, 35 PGY1 residents, and 87 P4 students. Response rates ranged from 26% (residency directors) to nearly 60% (P4 students and PGY1 residents). PGY1 residents and PGY1/PGY2 residency directors ranked research experience lowest among ten characteristics with respect to their importance when competing for a residency or being a successful resident. Among six specific clinical research skills, PGY1 residents and PGY1/PGY2 residency directors ranked "identifying and writing a research question" as the most important for successfully completing a residency research project or when selecting a PGY1/PGY2 resident.
Perceived importance of clinical research skills by P4 students, current residents, and residency program directors is low. This is in opposition to opinions from several national organizations that proclaim the importance of clinical research skills in doctor of pharmacy curricula. Pharmacy programs must continue to further develop clinical research skills and abilities of future graduates while being cognizant of these perception barriers when developing strategies to enhance research experiences within their curricular programs.
研究在药学实践领域中具有突出作用。然而,尚无研究从学生、住院医师或住院医师培训主任的角度评估研究方法在药学教育中的重要性。
2014年春季通过在线方式向四个应答群体发放问卷:科罗拉多大学四年级药学博士(P4)学生、第一年住院医师培训(PGY1)学员以及PGY1和第二年住院医师培训(PGY2)的培训主任。采用描述性统计来描述应答者特征;使用t检验和卡方检验来比较不同应答者群体。
应答者包括255名PGY1培训主任、155名PGY2培训主任、35名PGY1学员和87名P4学生。应答率从26%(培训主任)到近60%(P4学生和PGY1学员)不等。在竞争住院医师培训或成为一名成功的住院医师时,PGY1学员以及PGY1/PGY2培训主任将研究经验在十个特征中排在重要性最低的位置。在六项特定的临床研究技能中,PGY1学员以及PGY1/PGY2培训主任将“确定并撰写研究问题”列为成功完成住院医师培训研究项目或选拔PGY1/PGY2学员时最重要的技能。
P4学生、现任住院医师以及住院医师培训项目主任对临床研究技能的认知重要性较低。这与几个国家组织宣称临床研究技能在药学博士课程中的重要性的观点相悖。药学项目必须继续进一步培养未来毕业生的临床研究技能和能力,同时在制定课程项目中增强研究经验的策略时要认识到这些认知障碍。