Keeping It Simple in Sepsis Measures.
作者信息
Walkey Allan J, Lindenauer Peter K
机构信息
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Evans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
出版信息
J Hosp Med. 2017 Dec;12(12):1019-1020. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2873.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Keeping It Simple in Sepsis Measures.简化脓毒症的测量方法
J Hosp Med. 2017 Dec;12(12):1019-1020. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2873.
2
Assessing Variability in Hospital-Level Mortality Among U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries With Hospitalizations for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock.评估美国医疗保险受益人群因严重脓毒症和感染性休克住院的医院水平死亡率的变异性。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov;46(11):1753-1760. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003324.
3
Sepsis-Associated 30-Day Risk-Standardized Readmissions: Analysis of a Nationwide Medicare Sample.脓毒症相关30天风险标准化再入院率：一项全国医疗保险样本分析
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jul;45(7):1130-1137. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002476.
4
Hospital Perceptions of Medicare's Sepsis Quality Reporting Initiative.医院对医疗保险脓毒症质量报告倡议的看法。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Dec;12(12):963-968. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2929.
5
National Performance on the Medicare SEP-1 Sepsis Quality Measure.国家在 Medicare SEP-1 脓毒症质量测量上的表现。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;47(8):1026-1032. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003613.
6
Association of Registered Nurse Staffing With Mortality Risk of Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized With Sepsis.注册护士人员配备与因败血症住院的 Medicare 受益人的死亡率风险之间的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 May 27;3(5):e221173. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1173. eCollection 2022 May.
7
In-Hospital vs 30-Day Sepsis Mortality at US Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals.美国安全网和非安全网医院的住院与 30 天败血症死亡率比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412873. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12873.
8
Gaming hospital-level pneumonia 30-day mortality and readmission measures by legitimate changes to diagnostic coding.通过合理改变诊断编码来衡量医院获得性肺炎的30天死亡率和再入院情况。
Crit Care Med. 2015 May;43(5):989-95. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000862.
9
Hospital nurse staffing and sepsis protocol compliance and outcomes among patients with sepsis in the USA: a multistate cross-sectional analysis.美国脓毒症患者的医院护士配置和脓毒症护理协议遵守情况及结局：一项多州横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 22;12(3):e056802. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056802.
10
Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 4. Precoronavirus Disease 2019 Update January 2012-February 2020.医疗保险受益人群中的脓毒症：4. 2019 年冠状病毒病前更新，2012 年 1 月-2020 年 2 月。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Dec 1;49(12):2058-2069. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005332.
引用本文的文献
1
Implementation approaches and barriers for rule-based and machine learning-based sepsis risk prediction tools: a qualitative study.基于规则和基于机器学习的脓毒症风险预测工具的实施方法与障碍：一项定性研究
JAMIA Open. 2022 Apr 18;5(2):ooac022. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac022. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Inpatient hospital performance is associated with post-discharge sepsis mortality.住院患者的医院绩效与出院后脓毒症死亡率相关。
Crit Care. 2020 Oct 27;24(1):626. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03341-3.
3
Driving blind: instituting SEP-1 without high quality outcomes data.盲目推行：在缺乏高质量结果数据的情况下实施SEP-1。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12(Suppl 1):S22-S36. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.100.
本文引用的文献
1
Hospital Perceptions of Medicare's Sepsis Quality Reporting Initiative.医院对医疗保险脓毒症质量报告倡议的看法。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Dec;12(12):963-968. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2929.
2
Fourth Surviving Sepsis Campaign's hemodynamic recommendations: a step forward or a return to chaos?第四次拯救脓毒症运动的血流动力学建议：是进步还是回归混乱？
Crit Care. 2017 May 30;21(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1708-z.
3
Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.脓毒症强制紧急治疗的治疗时间与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703058. Epub 2017 May 21.
4
Physician Variation in Time to Antimicrobial Treatment for Septic Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.急诊科收治的脓毒症患者接受抗菌治疗时间的医生差异
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun;45(6):1011-1018. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002436.
5
The Timing of Early Antibiotics and Hospital Mortality in Sepsis.脓毒症中早期使用抗生素的时机与医院死亡率
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 1;196(7):856-863. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201609-1848OC.
6
Early, Goal-Directed Therapy for Septic Shock - A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.早期目标导向治疗脓毒性休克的患者水平荟萃分析。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2223-2234. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701380. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
7
Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中的液体管理、模式和结局：对大型国家数据库的分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 May;43(5):625-632. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4675-y. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
8
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动：脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南：2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
9
Early Goal-Directed Therapy for Sepsis: A Novel Solution for Discordant Survival Outcomes in Clinical Trials.脓毒症的早期目标导向治疗：临床试验中生存结果不一致问题的新解决方案。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):607-614. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002235.
10
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
Zotero 插件