Suppr超能文献

关乎诚信。

A matter of integrity.

作者信息

Petersdorf R G

机构信息

Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, D.C. 20036.

出版信息

Acad Med. 1989 Mar;64(3):119-23. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198903000-00003.

Abstract

There may be more aberrations in the moral and ethical behavior of scientists and physicians now than in the past. Fraud and misconduct in research have become a major stress point for both science and medicine. The "premed syndrome" (cheating in medical school and dishonesty during residency training) and fraud in medical practice are well known. Further, studies show that medical students are lenient towards dishonesty in education and practice. One result is that researchers and faculty members may turn to fraud when faced with the pressures to excel, produce, publish, be promoted, and win tenure. Also, physicians' ties to research and commercial endeavors raise questions of conflict of interest that may tarnish the medical image and compromise research findings. An AAMC ad hoc committee on research fraud identified three steps institutions might take: determination of the magnitude of the problem by a formal study; institution of guidelines for research, publication, and promotion; and establishment of policies for investigating allegations of fraud. Because of the problems of dishonesty, fraud, and conflict of interest, academic medical institutions must establish codes of conduct to govern professional life.

摘要

与过去相比,现在科学家和医生在道德和伦理行为方面可能存在更多偏差。科研中的欺诈和不当行为已成为科学和医学领域的一个主要压力点。“医学预科综合征”(医学院作弊以及住院医师培训期间的不诚实行为)以及医疗实践中的欺诈行为广为人知。此外,研究表明医学生对教育和实践中的不诚实行为持宽容态度。结果之一是研究人员和教员在面临追求卓越、产出成果、发表论文、获得晋升和终身教职的压力时,可能会转向欺诈行为。此外,医生与研究及商业活动的联系引发了利益冲突问题,这可能会损害医学形象并影响研究结果。美国医学协会(AAMC)一个关于科研欺诈的特设委员会确定了机构可以采取的三个步骤:通过正式研究确定问题的严重程度;制定研究、发表和晋升的指导方针;以及制定调查欺诈指控的政策。由于存在不诚实、欺诈和利益冲突问题,学术医疗机构必须制定行为准则来规范职业行为。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验