Lallemand Health Solutions Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada.
J Appl Microbiol. 2018 Feb;124(2):572-584. doi: 10.1111/jam.13666. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
AIMS: Classical microbiology techniques are the gold standard for probiotic enumeration. However, these techniques are limited by parameters of time, specificity and incapacity to detect viable but nonculturable (VBNC) micro-organisms and nonviable cells. The aim of the study was to evaluate flow cytometry as a novel method for the specific quantification of viable and nonviable probiotics in multistrain products. METHODS AND RESULTS: Custom polyclonal antibodies were produced against five probiotic strains from different species (Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071, Bifidobacterium longum ssp. infantis R0033, Bifidobacterium longum ssp. longum R0175, Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011). Evaluation of specificity confirmed that all antibodies were specific at least at the subspecies level. A flow cytometry method combining specific antibodies and viability assessment with SYTO 24 and propidium iodide was applied to quantify these strains in three commercial products. Analyses were conducted on two flow cytometry instruments by two operators and compared with classical microbiology using selective media. Results indicated that flow cytometry provides higher cell counts than classical microbiology (P < 0·05) in 73% of cases highlighting the possible presence of VBNC. Equivalent performances (repeatability and reproducibility) were obtained for both methods. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that flow cytometry methods can be applied to probiotic enumeration and viability assessment. Combination with polyclonal antibodies can achieve sufficient specificity to differentiate closely related strains. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Flow cytometry provides absolute and specific quantification of viable and nonviable probiotic strains in a very short time (<2 h) compared with classical techniques (>48 h), bringing efficient tools for research and development and quality control.
目的:经典微生物学技术是益生菌计数的金标准。然而,这些技术受到时间、特异性和无法检测存活但非可培养(VBNC)微生物和非存活细胞的参数限制。本研究旨在评估流式细胞术作为一种新方法,用于定量检测多菌株产品中活菌和死菌益生菌。
方法和结果:针对来自不同物种的五种益生菌菌株(双歧杆菌 bifidum R0071、长双歧杆菌 ssp. infantis R0033、长双歧杆菌 ssp. longum R0175、瑞士乳杆菌 R0052 和鼠李糖乳杆菌 R0011)生产了定制的多克隆抗体。特异性评估证实,所有抗体至少在亚种水平上都是特异性的。应用结合特异性抗体和 SYTO 24 和碘化丙啶的活菌评估的流式细胞术方法来定量三种商业产品中的这些菌株。由两名操作员在两台流式细胞仪上进行分析,并与使用选择性培养基的经典微生物学进行比较。结果表明,在 73%的情况下,流式细胞术比经典微生物学(P<0·05)提供更高的细胞计数,突出了 VBNC 的可能存在。两种方法均获得等效的性能(重复性和再现性)。
结论:本研究表明,流式细胞术方法可用于益生菌计数和活菌评估。与多克隆抗体结合可以达到足够的特异性,以区分密切相关的菌株。
研究的意义和影响:与经典技术(>48 小时)相比,流式细胞术在很短的时间内(<2 小时)提供了活菌和死菌益生菌菌株的绝对和特异性定量,为研究和开发以及质量控制带来了高效工具。
Food Microbiol. 2010-7-24
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020-10-15
Front Microbiol. 2023-12-7
Front Microbiol. 2023-11-10
BMC Microbiol. 2023-2-27