Rhodes G, Wooding R
University of Otago.
Brain Cogn. 1989 Mar;9(2):201-9. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(89)90030-4.
Recent evidence suggests that memory representations of familiar faces may exaggerate distinctive information as do caricatures (G. Rhodes, S. Brennan, & S. Carey, Cognitive Psychology, 1987). Therefore caricatures should be effective representations of faces and should yield a right hemisphere processing advantage, as do photographs of faces. Photographs and caricatures of famous faces were presented to the left visual (LVF), the right visual field (RVF), and centrally (CVF), in a name-face verification task. There was a LVF (right hemisphere) advantage for both caricatures and photographs on name-face mismatches but no VF difference for matches. These results were true for both accuracy and reaction time. Processing strategy differences that may account for the difference between matches and mismatches are discussed. Performance was generally better for photographs than for caricatures, irrespective of visual field condition.
最近的证据表明，熟悉面孔的记忆表征可能会像漫画那样夸大独特信息（G. 罗兹、S. 布伦南和S. 凯里，《认知心理学》，1987年）。因此，漫画应该是面孔的有效表征，并且应该像面孔照片一样产生右半球加工优势。在一项名字-面孔验证任务中，向左侧视野（LVF）、右侧视野（RVF）和中央视野（CVF）呈现著名面孔的照片和漫画。在名字-面孔不匹配的情况下，漫画和照片在左侧视野（右半球）都有优势，但在匹配情况下视野没有差异。这些结果在准确性和反应时间方面都是如此。讨论了可能解释匹配和不匹配之间差异的加工策略差异。无论视野条件如何，照片的表现通常都比漫画好。
