• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于静载测试的结构识别最优多类型传感器布置

Optimal Multi-Type Sensor Placement for Structural Identification by Static-Load Testing.

作者信息

Bertola Numa Joy, Papadopoulou Maria, Vernay Didier, Smith Ian F C

机构信息

ETH Zurich, Future Cities Laboratory, Singapore-ETH Centre, 1 CREATE Way, CREATE Tower, Singapore 138602, Singapore.

Applied Computing and Mechanics Laboratory (IMAC), School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (ENAC), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2017 Dec 14;17(12):2904. doi: 10.3390/s17122904.

DOI:10.3390/s17122904
PMID:29240684
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5751592/
Abstract

Assessing ageing infrastructure is a critical challenge for civil engineers due to the difficulty in the estimation and integration of uncertainties in structural models. Field measurements are increasingly used to improve knowledge of the real behavior of a structure; this activity is called structural identification. Error-domain model falsification (EDMF) is an easy-to-use model-based structural-identification methodology which robustly accommodates systematic uncertainties originating from sources such as boundary conditions, numerical modelling and model fidelity, as well as aleatory uncertainties from sources such as measurement error and material parameter-value estimations. In most practical applications of structural identification, sensors are placed using engineering judgment and experience. However, since sensor placement is fundamental to the success of structural identification, a more rational and systematic method is justified. This study presents a measurement system design methodology to identify the best sensor locations and sensor types using information from static-load tests. More specifically, three static-load tests were studied for the sensor system design using three types of sensors for a performance evaluation of a full-scale bridge in Singapore. Several sensor placement strategies are compared using joint entropy as an information-gain metric. A modified version of the hierarchical algorithm for sensor placement is proposed to take into account mutual information between load tests. It is shown that a carefully-configured measurement strategy that includes multiple sensor types and several load tests maximizes information gain.

摘要

由于在结构模型中估计和整合不确定性存在困难,评估老化基础设施对土木工程师来说是一项严峻挑战。现场测量越来越多地用于增进对结构实际性能的了解;这项活动被称为结构识别。误差域模型证伪(EDMF)是一种易于使用的基于模型的结构识别方法,它能稳健地处理源自边界条件、数值建模和模型保真度等因素的系统不确定性,以及源自测量误差和材料参数值估计等因素的偶然不确定性。在结构识别的大多数实际应用中,传感器是根据工程判断和经验布置的。然而,由于传感器布置是结构识别成功的基础,因此需要一种更合理、系统的方法。本研究提出一种测量系统设计方法,利用静载试验信息确定最佳传感器位置和传感器类型。具体而言,针对新加坡一座全尺寸桥梁的性能评估,使用三种类型的传感器对三个静载试验进行了传感器系统设计研究。使用联合熵作为信息增益指标比较了几种传感器布置策略。提出了一种改进版的传感器布置分层算法,以考虑荷载试验之间的互信息。结果表明,精心配置的测量策略,包括多种传感器类型和多次荷载试验,可使信息增益最大化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/6eed5bf3ab8f/sensors-17-02904-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/46524ca1f8a4/sensors-17-02904-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/d572211713c0/sensors-17-02904-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/6cb6ee9f903b/sensors-17-02904-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/4f59784df26d/sensors-17-02904-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/efece17161f5/sensors-17-02904-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/ce05a02ea77e/sensors-17-02904-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/f89636f96ee6/sensors-17-02904-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/bdc6d8b2f233/sensors-17-02904-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/32dceaa2f733/sensors-17-02904-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/74ac6cc00206/sensors-17-02904-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/95bd69440b79/sensors-17-02904-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/4f6e082c8f37/sensors-17-02904-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/d18f9cf54c15/sensors-17-02904-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/3feffdaf6f3f/sensors-17-02904-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/6eed5bf3ab8f/sensors-17-02904-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/46524ca1f8a4/sensors-17-02904-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/d572211713c0/sensors-17-02904-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/6cb6ee9f903b/sensors-17-02904-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/4f59784df26d/sensors-17-02904-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/efece17161f5/sensors-17-02904-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/ce05a02ea77e/sensors-17-02904-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/f89636f96ee6/sensors-17-02904-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/bdc6d8b2f233/sensors-17-02904-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/32dceaa2f733/sensors-17-02904-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/74ac6cc00206/sensors-17-02904-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/95bd69440b79/sensors-17-02904-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/4f6e082c8f37/sensors-17-02904-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/d18f9cf54c15/sensors-17-02904-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/3feffdaf6f3f/sensors-17-02904-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be7e/5751592/6eed5bf3ab8f/sensors-17-02904-g015.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal Multi-Type Sensor Placement for Structural Identification by Static-Load Testing.基于静载测试的结构识别最优多类型传感器布置
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Dec 14;17(12):2904. doi: 10.3390/s17122904.
2
Outlier-Detection Methodology for Structural Identification Using Sparse Static Measurements.基于稀疏静态测量的结构识别异常值检测方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 May 24;18(6):1702. doi: 10.3390/s18061702.
3
Role of Sensors in Error Propagation with the Dynamic Constrained Observability Method.传感器在动态约束可观测性方法误差传播中的作用。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 21;21(9):2918. doi: 10.3390/s21092918.
4
Effects of Sensor Location on Dynamic Load Estimation in Weigh-in-Motion System.传感器位置对动态称重系统中动态载荷估计的影响。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Sep 12;18(9):3044. doi: 10.3390/s18093044.
5
On the Design of Smart Parking Networks in the Smart Cities: An Optimal Sensor Placement Model.智能城市中智能停车网络的设计:一种最优传感器布局模型。
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Jun 30;15(7):15443-67. doi: 10.3390/s150715443.
6
Spatio-Temporal Field Estimation Using Kriged Kalman Filter (KKF) with Sparsity-Enforcing Sensor Placement.基于稀疏约束传感器放置的克里金卡尔曼滤波(KKF)的时空域估计。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jun 1;18(6):1778. doi: 10.3390/s18061778.
7
Virtual sensors for active noise control in acoustic-structural coupled enclosures using structural sensing: part II--Optimization of structural sensor placement.基于结构传感的声固耦合封闭空间主动噪声控制的虚拟传感器:第二部分——结构传感器位置优化。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Apr;129(4):1991-2004. doi: 10.1121/1.3552873.
8
Optimal Sensor Placement for Reliable Virtual Sensing Using Modal Expansion and Information Theory.基于模态展开和信息论的可靠虚拟传感的最优传感器布置。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 13;21(10):3400. doi: 10.3390/s21103400.
9
Optimal Sensor Placement in Reduced-Order Models Using Modal Constraint Conditions.基于模态约束条件的降阶模型中的最优传感器布置
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 13;22(2):589. doi: 10.3390/s22020589.
10
An Entropy Based Bayesian Network Framework for System Health Monitoring.一种用于系统健康监测的基于熵的贝叶斯网络框架。
Entropy (Basel). 2018 May 30;20(6):416. doi: 10.3390/e20060416.

引用本文的文献

1
Smartphone Prospects in Bridge Structural Health Monitoring, a Literature Review.智能手机在桥梁结构健康监测中的应用前景:文献综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 21;24(11):3287. doi: 10.3390/s24113287.
2
Optimal Sensor Placement for Reliable Virtual Sensing Using Modal Expansion and Information Theory.基于模态展开和信息论的可靠虚拟传感的最优传感器布置。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 13;21(10):3400. doi: 10.3390/s21103400.
3
On a Sensor Placement Methodology for Monitoring the Vibrations of Horizontally Excited Ground.一种用于监测水平激励地面振动的传感器布置方法
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 30;20(7):1938. doi: 10.3390/s20071938.
4
Efficient Sensor Placement Optimization for Shape Deformation Sensing of Antenna Structures with Fiber Bragg Grating Strain Sensors.基于光纤布拉格光栅应变传感器的天线结构形状变形感应的高效传感器位置优化。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Aug 1;18(8):2481. doi: 10.3390/s18082481.
5
Outlier-Detection Methodology for Structural Identification Using Sparse Static Measurements.基于稀疏静态测量的结构识别异常值检测方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 May 24;18(6):1702. doi: 10.3390/s18061702.