Louant Orian, Champagne Benoît, Liégeois Vincent
Laboratoire de Chimie Théorique, UCPTS, Namur Institute of Structured Matter, Université de Namur , rue de Bruxelles 61, B-5000 Namur, Belgium.
J Phys Chem A. 2018 Feb 1;122(4):972-984. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b10881. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
Energy minima on the potential energy surfaces of the ground and excited states have been characterized for three photoactive molecules that undergo excited-state intramolecular proton transfer: 3-hydroxychromone, N-salicylideneaniline, and 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)benzothiazole. Both the CC2 method and the TDDFT methodology with different exchange-correlation (XC) functionals differing by the amount of Hartree-Fock (HF) exchange have been employed. Besides the analysis of the structures along the reaction paths, this study has compared the TDDFT and CC2 results to provide guidelines for selecting the best XC functionals. Several geometrical parameters as well as the excitation energies are found to vary monotonically with the amount of HF exchange. Systematically, this study has addressed the ground-state geometries, those of the excited states, and their variations upon excitation, showing that the M06 XC functional provides the closest agreement with the CC2 results. Still, large differences of geometries have been observed between the different levels of approximation, mostly for the excited states: (i) Not all methods locate the same number of minima, (ii) the bond length variations upon excitation might be reversed, and (iii) the H-bond network can be modified from one level to another, changing the keto/enol character. Moreover, TDDFT/M06 and B3LYP-35 vertical excitation energies are in good agreement with the CC2 values. All in all, these results call for being cautious when using these optimized geometries for predicting the spectroscopic signatures of these compounds to understand the processes that take place during photoexcitation.
3-羟基色酮、N-水杨醛苯胺和2-(2-羟基苯基)苯并噻唑,已对其基态和激发态势能面上的能量最小值进行了表征。采用了CC2方法以及具有不同交换相关(XC)泛函(因Hartree-Fock(HF)交换量不同)的TDDFT方法。除了分析沿反应路径的结构外,本研究还比较了TDDFT和CC2的结果,以提供选择最佳XC泛函的指导原则。发现几个几何参数以及激发能随HF交换量单调变化。本研究系统地研究了基态几何结构、激发态几何结构及其激发时的变化,表明M06 XC泛函与CC2结果最为接近。然而,在不同近似水平之间仍观察到几何结构的巨大差异,主要是对于激发态:(i)并非所有方法定位的最小值数量相同,(ii)激发时键长的变化可能相反,(iii)氢键网络可以从一个水平改变到另一个水平,从而改变酮式/烯醇式特征。此外,TDDFT/M06和B3LYP-35垂直激发能与CC2值吻合良好。总而言之,在使用这些优化的几何结构来预测这些化合物的光谱特征以理解光激发过程中发生的过程时,这些结果需要谨慎对待。