Suppr超能文献

基于生物标志物的治疗决策建模中定时自动机与离散事件模拟的比较:转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的示例

Comparison of Timed Automata with Discrete Event Simulation for Modeling of Biomarker-Based Treatment Decisions: An Illustration for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

作者信息

Degeling Koen, Schivo Stefano, Mehra Niven, Koffijberg Hendrik, Langerak Rom, de Bono Johann S, IJzerman Maarten J

机构信息

Health Technology and Services Research Department, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Formal Methods and Tools Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Value Health. 2017 Dec;20(10):1411-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the advent of personalized medicine, the field of health economic modeling is being challenged and the use of patient-level dynamic modeling techniques might be required.

OBJECTIVES

To illustrate the usability of two such techniques, timed automata (TA) and discrete event simulation (DES), for modeling personalized treatment decisions.

METHODS

An early health technology assessment on the use of circulating tumor cells, compared with prostate-specific antigen and bone scintigraphy, to inform treatment decisions in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was performed. Both modeling techniques were assessed quantitatively, in terms of intermediate outcomes (e.g., overtreatment) and health economic outcomes (e.g., net monetary benefit). Qualitatively, among others, model structure, agent interactions, data management (i.e., importing and exporting data), and model transparency were assessed.

RESULTS

Both models yielded realistic and similar intermediate and health economic outcomes. Overtreatment was reduced by 6.99 and 7.02 weeks by applying circulating tumor cell as a response marker at a net monetary benefit of -€1033 and -€1104 for the TA model and the DES model, respectively. Software-specific differences were observed regarding data management features and the support for statistical distributions, which were considered better for the DES software. Regarding method-specific differences, interactions were modeled more straightforward using TA, benefiting from its compositional model structure.

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques prove suitable for modeling personalized treatment decisions, although DES would be preferred given the current software-specific limitations of TA. When these limitations are resolved, TA would be an interesting modeling alternative if interactions are key or its compositional structure is useful to manage multi-agent complex problems.

摘要

背景

随着个性化医疗的出现,健康经济建模领域正面临挑战,可能需要使用患者层面的动态建模技术。

目的

说明两种此类技术,即定时自动机(TA)和离散事件模拟(DES),在个性化治疗决策建模中的可用性。

方法

对使用循环肿瘤细胞与前列腺特异性抗原和骨闪烁显像相比,为转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的治疗决策提供信息进行了早期卫生技术评估。从中间结果(如过度治疗)和健康经济结果(如净货币效益)方面对这两种建模技术进行了定量评估。定性方面,除其他外,评估了模型结构、主体交互、数据管理(即数据的导入和导出)以及模型透明度。

结果

两个模型都产生了现实且相似的中间结果和健康经济结果。通过将循环肿瘤细胞用作反应标志物,TA模型和DES模型的过度治疗分别减少了6.99周和7.02周,净货币效益分别为-1033欧元和-1104欧元。在数据管理功能和对统计分布的支持方面观察到了软件特定的差异,认为DES软件在这方面更好。关于方法特定的差异,使用TA可以更直接地对交互进行建模,这得益于其组合模型结构。

结论

两种技术都证明适用于个性化治疗决策建模,不过鉴于TA目前的软件特定限制,DES更受青睐。当这些限制得到解决时,如果交互是关键因素或者其组合结构有助于管理多主体复杂问题,TA将是一种有趣的建模选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验