Suppr超能文献

Wada 试验与神经影像学偏侧化的一致性:成像方式(fMRI 和 MEG)和患者经验的影响。

Concordance between the Wada test and neuroimaging lateralization: Influence of imaging modality (fMRI and MEG) and patient experience.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Jan;78:155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

Abstract

The Wada test remains the traditional test for lateralizing language and memory function prior to epilepsy surgery. Functional imaging, particularly functional MRI (fMRI), has made progress in the language domain, but less so in the memory domain. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has received less research attention, but shows promise, particularly for language lateralization. We recruited a consecutive sample of 19 patients with epilepsy who had completed presurgical work-up, including the Wada test, and compared fMRI (memory) and MEG (language and memory) with Wada test results. The main research question was the concordance between Wada and these two imaging techniques as preepilepsy surgery investigations. We were also interested in the acceptability of the three techniques to patients. Concordance rates (N=16) were nonsignificant (Cohen's Kappa) between fMRI and Wada test (memory) and between MEG and Wada test (memory and language). The Wada test was a well-established protocol used at several epilepsy surgery centers in the UK. Patients generally found the Wada test an odd, but not aversive procedure. Sixteen (84%) patients who were scanned reported some level of obtundation in MEG. We present these discordant findings in support of the position that functional imaging and the Wada test are distinctive procedures, with little in the way of overlapping mechanisms, and that patient's experience should be taken into account when procedures are selected and offered to them.

摘要

在癫痫手术前,Wada 测试仍然是用于定位语言和记忆功能的传统测试。功能成像,特别是功能磁共振成像(fMRI),在语言领域取得了进展,但在记忆领域进展较少。脑磁图(MEG)受到的研究关注较少,但显示出希望,尤其是在语言定位方面。我们招募了 19 名连续的癫痫患者,这些患者已经完成了术前评估,包括 Wada 测试,并将 fMRI(记忆)和 MEG(语言和记忆)与 Wada 测试结果进行了比较。主要研究问题是 Wada 与这两种成像技术作为术前研究的一致性。我们还对这三种技术对患者的可接受性感兴趣。fMRI 和 Wada 测试(记忆)之间(N=16)和 MEG 和 Wada 测试(记忆和语言)之间的一致性率(Cohen's Kappa)没有统计学意义。Wada 测试是英国几家癫痫手术中心使用的成熟协议。患者普遍认为 Wada 测试是一种奇怪但不令人反感的程序。接受 MEG 扫描的 16 名(84%)患者报告说有一定程度的意识模糊。我们提出这些不一致的发现,以支持以下观点:功能成像和 Wada 测试是独特的程序,它们之间很少有重叠的机制,在选择和向患者提供程序时,应该考虑到患者的体验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验