Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Pediatric Rheumatology & RK Mellon Institute for Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Immunol Rev. 2018 Jan;281(1):115-123. doi: 10.1111/imr.12607.
15 years ago, the fundamental biology of an inflammatory signaling complex eventually dubbed "the inflammasome" began to unravel in chronologic parallel with the discovery that many inflammatory diseases were associated with its hyperactivity. Though the genetic origins of Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF, caused my mutations in MEFV) were discovered first, it would take nearly two decades before the mechanistic connections to a PYRIN inflammasome were made. In the interim, the intensive study of the NLRP3 inflammasome, and the diseases associated with its hyperactivation, have largely dictated the paradigm of inflammasome composition and function. Despite impressive gains, focusing on NLRP3 left gaps in our understanding of inflammasome biology. Foremost among these gaps were how inflammasomes become activated and the connections between inflammasome structure and function. Fortunately, work in another inflammasome inducer, NLRC4, grew to fill those gaps. The current understanding of the NLRC4 inflammasome is perhaps the most comprehensive illustration of the inflammasome paradigm: trigger (e.g. cytosolic flagellin), sensor (NAIP), nucleator (NLRC4), adaptor (ASC), and effector (CASP1). Detailed work has also identified observations that challenge this paradigm. Simultaneously, the features unique to each inflammasome offer a lesson in contrast, providing perspectives on inflammasome activation, regulation, and function. In this review, we endeavor to highlight recent breakthroughs related to NLRC4 inflammasome structure and activation, important in vivo work in infection and systemic inflammation, and the characterization of a spectrum of human NLRC4-associated autoinflammatory diseases.
15 年前,一种被称为“炎症小体”的炎症信号复合物的基本生物学开始逐渐被揭示,与此同时,人们发现许多炎症性疾病都与它的过度活跃有关。虽然家族性地中海热(FMF,由 MEFV 基因突变引起)的遗传起源首先被发现,但直到近 20 年后,才发现与 PYRIN 炎症小体的机制联系。在此期间,对 NLRP3 炎症小体及其与过度激活相关的疾病的深入研究在很大程度上决定了炎症小体组成和功能的范例。尽管取得了令人瞩目的进展,但专注于 NLRP3 仍使我们对炎症小体生物学的理解存在空白。其中最突出的空白是炎症小体如何被激活,以及炎症小体结构和功能之间的联系。幸运的是,另一种炎症小体诱导剂 NLRC4 的研究工作填补了这些空白。目前对 NLRC4 炎症小体的理解也许是对炎症小体范例最全面的说明:触发物(例如胞质鞭毛蛋白)、传感器(NAIP)、成核物(NLRC4)、衔接子(ASC)和效应物(CASP1)。详细的工作还确定了一些挑战这一范例的观察结果。同时,每个炎症小体的独特特征提供了一个对比的视角,为炎症小体的激活、调节和功能提供了见解。在这篇综述中,我们努力强调与 NLRC4 炎症小体结构和激活相关的最新突破,以及感染和全身炎症的重要体内工作,以及一系列人类 NLRC4 相关自身炎症性疾病的特征。