Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Feb;101(2):1785-1794. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13578. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
The objective of this cross-sectional herd-level study was to assess the association of calf management practices on source dairy farms with mortality risk on veal farms. From April to October 2016, 52 source dairy farms supplying male calves to 2 veal operations were visited once. A questionnaire was administered that covered all areas of calf management, calves between 1 and 10 d of age were examined using a standardized health scoring system, and blood was taken to evaluate passive transfer of immunoglobulins. The mortality risk for calves from each dairy farm was calculated based on the number of male calves sold from the dairy farm and that died during 2016 at the veal operations. The mean mortality risk was calculated for both veal farms and, based on the veal facility-adjusted mortality risk, dairy farms were classified as high- or low-mortality source farms. Using the information gathered at the 52 source dairy farms, a logistic regression model was used to assess factors associated with being a high-mortality source farm. Suppliers to veal farm 1 had a mean mortality risk of 9.6% and suppliers to veal farm 2 had a mean mortality risk of 4.2%. The lower mortality risk at veal farm 2 was partially influenced by a shorter period of observation. Of the 182 calves examined during the single visit to the source dairy farms, 41% of male calves and 29% of female calves had at least one identifiable health abnormality. The risk of failure of passive transfer on source dairy farms was low, with only 13% of calves tested having <10 mg of IgG/mL of serum. The subset of calves examined at the source dairy farm was not followed prospectively to the veal farms. Using a tube feeder or pail to feed colostrum, bedding male calves on wood shavings or chopped straw at the source dairy farm, and the herd veterinarian not routinely and actively inquiring about the health and performance of calves during regular herd visits were significantly associated with the farm being classified as a high-mortality source dairy farm. Checking the calving pen at an interval of every 3 h or more during the day was associated with a lower probability of being classified as a high-mortality source dairy farm. The results of this study suggest that there are management practices on the source farm that contribute to the risk of mortality on veal farms.
本横断面群体研究旨在评估奶牛场小牛管理措施与小牛肉牛场死亡率之间的关系。2016 年 4 月至 10 月,对 52 个供应公犊牛的奶牛场进行了一次访问。进行了一项问卷调查,涵盖了小牛管理的各个方面,对 1 至 10 日龄的小牛使用标准化健康评分系统进行了检查,并采集血液以评估免疫球蛋白的被动转移。根据从奶牛场出售的公犊牛数量以及 2016 年在小牛肉牛场死亡的数量,计算了每个奶牛场小牛的死亡率。为两个小牛肉牛场计算了平均死亡率,并根据小牛肉设施调整的死亡率,将奶牛场分为高死亡率或低死亡率的源头农场。使用在 52 个奶牛场收集的信息,使用逻辑回归模型评估与高死亡率源头农场相关的因素。第一个小牛肉牛场的供应商的平均死亡率为 9.6%,第二个小牛肉牛场的供应商的平均死亡率为 4.2%。第二个小牛肉牛场较低的死亡率部分是由于观察期较短。在对奶牛场的单次访问中,对 182 头小牛进行了检查,其中 41%的公犊牛和 29%的母犊牛至少有一种可识别的健康异常。在奶牛场的小牛被动转移失败的风险很低,只有 13%的小牛检测到血清中 IgG/mL 小于 10mg。在奶牛场进行检查的小牛子集并没有前瞻性地跟踪到小牛肉牛场。在奶牛场使用管饲器或桶喂初乳、在奶牛场将公犊牛放在木屑或切碎的稻草上、以及兽医在常规的牛群检查中不主动询问小牛的健康和表现与将奶牛场归类为高死亡率的源头奶牛场显著相关。白天每隔 3 小时或更长时间检查产犊栏与被归类为高死亡率的源头奶牛场的概率较低有关。本研究结果表明,奶牛场的管理措施与小牛肉牛场的死亡率风险有关。