Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York; Cardiothoracic Department, Division of Cardiology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 8;11(1):68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.060. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
This study sought to investigate the effect of different body mass index (BMI) categories on clinical outcomes in female patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and drug-eluting stents.
Patients with higher BMI might, paradoxically, have better long-term clinical outcomes after acute coronary syndrome treated with PCI.
We pooled patient-level data for female participants from 26 randomized trials on PCI with drug-eluting stents. Patients were stratified into underweight (BMI, <18.5), normoweight (BMI, 18.5 to 24.9), overweight (BMI, 25 to 29.9), obese (BMI, 30 to 34.9), or morbidly obese (BMI, ≥35). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization at 3 years.
Among 11,557 female patients included in the pooled database, 9,420 were treated with a drug-eluting stent and had BMI data available. Patients with higher BMI were significantly younger and with more cardiovascular risk factors. Only 139 patients were underweight and had significantly higher adjusted rates of cardiac mortality and all-cause mortality than the rest of the population (hazard ratio: 2.20 [1.31 to 3.71] compared with normoweight). There was a significantly lower frequency of unadjusted 3-year all-cause mortality in overweight, obese, and severely obese patients compared with normoweight. However, following multivariable analysis, a trend toward increased risk of death in severely obese patients was observed, describing an inverse "J"-shaped relation between BMI and 3-year mortality. Conversely, the relationship between BMI and other outcomes, such as major adverse cardiac events, was flat for normoweight and higher BMI.
The risk of 3-year adjusted cardiac events did not differ across BMI groups, whereas the risk of all-cause mortality compared with normoweight was significantly higher in underweight patients and lower in overweight patients with a trend toward increased risk in the severely obese population.
本研究旨在探讨不同体重指数(BMI)类别对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和药物洗脱支架治疗的女性患者临床结局的影响。
患有更高 BMI 的患者在接受 PCI 治疗急性冠状动脉综合征后,其长期临床结局可能会更好,这似乎有些矛盾。
我们汇总了 26 项关于 PCI 和药物洗脱支架的随机临床试验中女性患者的个体数据。将患者分为体重过轻(BMI<18.5)、体重正常(BMI 18.5-24.9)、超重(BMI 25-29.9)、肥胖(BMI 30-34.9)或病态肥胖(BMI≥35)。主要终点是 3 年内的主要不良心脏事件,即死亡、心肌梗死或靶病变血运重建的复合终点。
在纳入汇总数据库的 11557 名女性患者中,有 9420 名患者接受了药物洗脱支架治疗,并且有 BMI 数据。BMI 较高的患者明显更年轻,且具有更多心血管危险因素。仅有 139 名患者体重过轻,其校正后心脏死亡率和全因死亡率均显著高于其他人群(风险比:2.20[1.31 至 3.71],与体重正常组相比)。与体重正常组相比,超重、肥胖和极重度肥胖患者未校正的 3 年全因死亡率明显较低。然而,经过多变量分析,发现极重度肥胖患者的死亡风险呈上升趋势,表明 BMI 与 3 年死亡率之间存在一种反“J”形关系。相反,BMI 与其他结局(如主要不良心脏事件)之间的关系在体重正常和更高 BMI 患者中呈平坦趋势。
3 年校正后的心脏不良事件风险在 BMI 组之间没有差异,而与体重正常组相比,全因死亡率在体重过轻患者中显著升高,在超重患者中降低,极重度肥胖患者的风险呈上升趋势。