Lee Sang Hoon, Jeong Myung Ho, Oh Seok, Lim Yonghwan, Ahn Joon Ho, Hyun Dae Young, Lee Seung Hun, Cho Kyung Hoon, Kim Min Chul, Sim Doo Sun, Hong Young Joon, Kim Ju Han, Ahn Youngkeun
Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Department of Cardiology, Gwangju Veterans Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Chonnam Med J. 2024 Sep;60(3):147-154. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2024.60.3.147. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
Prescribing a P2Y12 inhibitor for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is challenging because of the risk of bleeding and ischemia. We compared the risk of ischemia and bleeding between clopidogrel and ticagrelor in elderly East Asian patients with diabetes using the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR)-V data. This study included 838 patients enrolled in the KAMIR-V who were >75 years, had DM, AMI, and had undergone PCI. The patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment drug. After propensity score matching, 466 patients (ticagrelor: clopidogrel= 233:233) were included in the Cox regression analyses to determine the risk of bleeding and ischemia. The baseline characteristics were not different. The type of antiplatelet therapy did not affect the incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥2 bleeding. There was no significant difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel treatment outcomes with respect to ischemia risk. This prospective study of a Korean patient cohort (elderly Korean patients with DM) showed no differences in bleeding and ischemia risks based on the use of either ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Large scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to determine the optimal antiplatelet agents for these patients.
对于患有糖尿病(DM)且发生急性心肌梗死(AMI)并已接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者,开具P2Y12抑制剂具有挑战性,因为存在出血和缺血风险。我们使用韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究(KAMIR)-V数据,比较了老年东亚糖尿病患者中氯吡格雷和替格瑞洛的缺血和出血风险。本研究纳入了KAMIR-V中838例年龄大于75岁、患有DM、AMI且接受了PCI的患者。根据治疗药物将患者分为两组。在倾向得分匹配后,466例患者(替格瑞洛:氯吡格雷 = 233:233)纳入Cox回归分析以确定出血和缺血风险。基线特征无差异。抗血小板治疗类型不影响出血学术研究联盟(Bleeding Academic Research Consortium)≥2型出血的发生率。替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷治疗结果在缺血风险方面无显著差异。这项针对韩国患者队列(老年韩国糖尿病患者)的前瞻性研究表明,使用替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷在出血和缺血风险方面无差异。有必要进行大规模随机对照试验以确定这些患者的最佳抗血小板药物。