Suppr超能文献

年龄、合并症和多种药物治疗对依度沙班治疗静脉血栓栓塞疗效和安全性的影响:随机、双盲 Hokusai-VTE 试验分析。

Impact of age, comorbidity, and polypharmacy on the efficacy and safety of edoxaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism: An analysis of the randomized, double-blind Hokusai-VTE trial.

机构信息

University Hospitals Leuven, Dept. of Cardiovascular Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.

University Hospitals Leuven, Dept. of Cardiovascular Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2018 Feb;162:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are elderly, have multiple comorbidities and take several concomitant medications. Physicians may prefer warfarin over direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in such patients because comparative data are lacking. This analysis was designed to determine the effects of advanced age, comorbidities, and polypharmacy on the efficacy and safety of edoxaban and warfarin in patients with VTE.

METHODS

Using data from the Hokusai-VTE study, we report rates of recurrent VTE and of clinically relevant bleeding by age category (<65, 65-75, and ≥75; <80 versus ≥80years), and by number of comorbidities (0, 1-2, >2) and concomitant medications (<3, 3-5, >5). Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for edoxaban versus warfarin were determined and Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to construct time-to-event curves. At 3months, pre- and postdose levels of edoxaban were measured using mass spectrometry. For warfarin-treated patients, the time in therapeutic range was calculated. The study was approved by institutional review boards; informed consent was obtained.

RESULTS

Recurrent VTE increased with advanced age, multiple comorbidities, and polypharmacy in warfarin-treated patients but not with edoxaban. Edoxaban was more effective than warfarin in patients ≥75years of age and in those with multiple comorbidities. In the 517 patients over 80years of age, recurrent VTE occurred in 2.8% given edoxaban and in 5.7% given warfarin (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.21-1.24). Bleeding increased with age, comorbidity, and polypharmacy regardless of treatment, but the relative safety of edoxaban versus well-managed warfarin was maintained. Age, comorbidity, and polypharmacy did not impact edoxaban concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that a once-daily fixed dose of edoxaban is more effective and at least as safe as warfarin in high-risk VTE patients identified by older age, more comorbidities, and polypharmacy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00986154.

摘要

背景

许多静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者年龄较大,合并多种疾病并同时服用多种药物。由于缺乏对比数据,医生可能更倾向于在这些患者中使用华法林而非直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)。本分析旨在确定高龄、合并症和多药治疗对 VTE 患者依度沙班和华法林疗效和安全性的影响。

方法

利用 Hokusai-VTE 研究的数据,我们按年龄(<65 岁、65-75 岁和≥75 岁;<80 岁与≥80 岁)和合并症数量(0、1-2 和>2)以及合并用药(<3、3-5 和>5)报告了依度沙班和华法林治疗的患者中复发性 VTE 和临床相关出血的发生率。依度沙班与华法林的风险比(HR)及其相应 95%置信区间(CI)通过危险比(HR)及其相应 95%置信区间(CI)进行确定,并使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法构建时间事件曲线。在 3 个月时,使用质谱法测量依度沙班的治疗前和治疗后水平。对于接受华法林治疗的患者,计算了治疗范围内的时间。该研究得到了机构审查委员会的批准,并获得了知情同意。

结果

在接受华法林治疗的患者中,复发性 VTE 随着年龄的增长、合并症的增多和多药治疗而增加,但在接受依度沙班治疗的患者中则没有。在≥75 岁和合并多种疾病的患者中,依度沙班比华法林更有效。在 517 名 80 岁以上的患者中,接受依度沙班治疗的患者中复发性 VTE 的发生率为 2.8%,而接受华法林治疗的患者为 5.7%(HR 0.51,95%CI 0.21-1.24)。无论治疗方法如何,出血都会随着年龄、合并症和多药治疗的增加而增加,但依度沙班相对于华法林的相对安全性得以维持。年龄、合并症和多药治疗并不影响依度沙班的浓度。

结论

这些数据表明,对于因高龄、合并症较多和多药治疗而被确定为高危 VTE 患者,每日一次固定剂量的依度沙班比华法林更有效,且安全性至少相当。

临床试验注册

NCT00986154。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验